增脉汤对窦性心过缓的治疗研究.pdfVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
增脉汤对窦性心过缓的治疗研究

Clinical Research on Zeng Mai Decoction in Treating Sinus Bradycadia Speciality: Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine Author: Yan xumei Tutor: Wang Cuiping Abstract Objective: To observe the clinical effect and study the functioning theory of Zeng Mai Decoction in treating Sinus Bradycadia about insufficiency of the Heart qi and yang and stasis of blood and phlegmy on the base of traditional and modern theory. Methods: 50 patients with SB were randomly divided into two groups: 25 patients in treatment group and 25 patients in control group. The treatment group was treated with Zeng Mai Decoction meanwhile in the control group the patients took xinbao pills. Four weeks later, the result is observed. Results: Curative effect of the heart rate :the total effect rate of the treatment group is 80%,in the control group ,its total effect rate is 60%.The comparison of the two groups of the heart rate,the total effective rate has statistic significance (P ﹤0.05 ). It means that Zeng Mai Decoction has obvious effect on adding the heart rate (HR) ; The comparison of Holter:the comparison of the minimum heart rate,average heart rate and maximum heart rate of the two groups has statistic significance (P ﹤0.01 ); Curative effect of the clinic symptom: the total effect rate of the treatment group is 92 %,in the control group ,its total effect rate is 52%, the comparison of the two groups has statistic significance (P ﹤0.05 ).Comparison of each clinic symptom cumulative scoring:the treatment group is better than the control group in improving shortness of breath ,spontaneous perspiration,fatigue,lacking in strength and so on.;The compre

文档评论(0)

canggu808866 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档