限制理论的与应用要点分析.pptVIP

結語 If I can find a leverage point, I can move the earth ….Archimedes 打蛇打七吋 、四兩撥千斤…中國古老智慧 敬請指教！！ * 這有什麼不好? 鼓勵每個部門追求自己部門的績效與部門間的競爭, 會導致各部門無法同步化運作, 追求局部最佳反而會傷害到整體績效, 而且容易形成本位主義的心態 更嚴重的是, 這樣的管理思維與假設, 導致了許多根深蒂固的組織衝突, 例如研發單位應專注於新產品開發或專注於現有產品的改善? 生產單位應以效率為主要績效衡量指標或不要以效率為主要績效衡量標? 採購應跟可靠的供應商採購或跟低價供應商採購?... 然而由於我們認為組織系統是很複雜, 因此我們能做的是盡量改善子系統的同步化, 盡量促成子系統之間較好的合作, 但是這些努力卻是徒勞無功,這些衝突仍然一直存在著 只要我們認為這是我們目前唯一能做的改善方案, 我們就會認為要在短時間內改善組織, 使其得到顯著的整體效益, 將會是很困難而且不切實際! * 這有什麼不好? 鼓勵每個部門追求自己部門的績效與部門間的競爭, 會導致各部門無法同步化運作, 追求局部最佳反而會傷害到整體績效, 而且容易形成本位主義的心態 更嚴重的是, 這樣的管理思維與假設, 導致了許多根深蒂固的組織衝突, 例如研發單位應專注於新產品開發或專注於現有產品的改善? 生產單位應以效率為主要績效衡量指標或不要以效率為主要績效衡量標? 採購應跟可靠的供應商採購或跟低價供應商採購?... 然而由於我們認為組織系統是很複雜, 因此我們能做的是盡量改善子系統的同步化, 盡量促成子系統之間較好的合作, 但是這些努力卻是徒勞無功,這些衝突仍然一直存在著 只要我們認為這是我們目前唯一能做的改善方案, 我們就會認為要在短時間內改善組織, 使其得到顯著的整體效益, 將會是很困難而且不切實際! * Who determines the goal of the system? The people (like owner) who build the system determines the goal of the system Necessary conditions imposed by the power groups such as government, stakeholder VV is for money making organizations only Why do you need to improve? If surviving is not a goal, why do we interesting to have continuous improvement? The goal of the system and the behavior of the manager (people is born for better) (both are the basic assumption for improvement) The basic assumption is that you cannot prove it , you only accept it or not? TOC is too much to people because the two words: “Theory” and “Constraint” The Jonah is the personal who like to change I have the open ended goal, I have energy and desire to improve, but I am limited by constraints Simple, right, but in reality it is not such simple, why? Adopt the mind set of the constraint * How do we know we have a core problem? We cannot prove it, so that it is why we make it an assumption One chain only have one constraint (singularity) We are bother by the choopchick (my plant is going to be closed. My boss park on my parking space is really bother and irritating me, it is choopchick How to change