我国房地产宏观调控政策效果评估初探——基于公共政策评估的视角分析报告.docVIP

我国房地产宏观调控政策效果评估初探 ——基于公共政策评估的视角 摘 要：2003年以来，国家多次通过土地政策、税收政策、金融政策等措施以求对过热的我国房地产市场进行调控，虽取得了一定的成效，但房价上涨势头并没有得到有效控制，政策实施效果与预期目标尚有一定的偏差。本文以上海为例，结合公共政策评估理论和方法，对房地产宏观调控效果进行评估，探讨调控政策的成效与不足。评估结果显示，上海房地产调控政策取得了一定效果，然而在全国范围内，尤其是2009年房价的上涨状况，表明我国房地产宏观调控政策仍存在短期性、相机性、非均衡性等问题。笔者认为，房地产宏观调控政策应建立相应的长效调控机制以稳定市场主体预期，在提高市场绩效、建立有效房地产市场的同时采取相应的激励机制，兼顾经济效率与社会公平，引导住房的有效供求，从而促进房地产市场的稳定健康发展。 关键字：房地产 宏观调控 政策评估 长效调控机制 Evaluation on Effects of China’s Macro-economic Control of Real Estate Market - Based on the Perspective of Public Policy Evaluation Abstract: Since 2003, our state has taken some measures to regulate the overheated real estate market for many times，including the land policy, tax policy, monetary policy measures, but the trend of housing prices has not been effectively controlled, and the implement of policies deviates the objectives. In this paper, we set Shanghai as the example, based on evaluation of public policy, to assess the effect of macro-economic control on real estate in Shanghai. Evaluation results show that Shanghais real estate regulatory policy has achieved some results, but at the national level, especially housing prices rising significantly in 2009, macro-economic control on real estate is still short-term and discretionary. The author believes that we should establish long-term effective control mechanism to stabilize the expectations of market players, then can improve the performance of real estate market, take the appropriate incentives, both economic efficiency and social equity, and guide housing effective supply and demand, so as to promote stability and healthy development of real estate market. Keywords: Real estate; Macro-economic control; Policy evaluation; Mechanism for long-term control 一、引言 2003年以来，国家多次通过土地政策、税收政策、金融政策等措施以求对过热的房地产市场进行调控：2005年3月，中央先后出台了新老“国八条”对房地产进行宏观调控；2006年5月，国务院出台了新的 “国六条” ,以进一步抑制房价上涨，内容涵盖了税收、信贷、土地供应、市场、结构乃至信息披露等方面。但房价上涨势头并没有得到有效控制。受2008年全球金融危机的冲击，房价曾在2008年底一度低迷，但2009年第二季度便开始反弹，2009年12月房价同比增长达7.8%，环比涨幅也高达1.5%，创下了2009年全年的新高，也