AssessingAlternativeAssumptionsonDefaultRiskCapitalinthe.doc

AssessingAlternativeAssumptionsonDefaultRiskCapitalinthe.doc

  1. 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
AssessingAlternativeAssumptionsonDefaultRiskCapitalinthe.doc

Assessing Alternative Assumptions on Default Risk Capital in the Trading Book December 12, 2006 Gary Dunn: UK Financial Services Authority Michael Gibson: Federal Reserve Board Gloria Ikosi: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Jonathan Jones: Office of Thrift Supervision Charles Monet: US Securities and Exchange Commission Michael Sullivan: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency I. Objective In this paper, we illustrate the range of potential default losses for trading books across a range of possible assumptions. These results are also compared with A-IRB capital requirements. The intent of this analysis is not to specify the “correct” set of assumptions for computing default risk in the trading book, since each firm will make its own assumptions in modeling default losses in its trading book. Instead, we examine the sensitivity of default risk capital to the choice of alternative modeling assumptions. The Revised Accord requires firms to model incremental default risk in the trading book. In this paper, we consider only capital for default risk and do not consider the impact of adjustments for double counting of default risk and spread risk. We will consider this issue in a separate analysis, which we intend to prepare in the near future. II. Summary of Findings Disclaimer: These results are indicative rather than authoritative. We used a standard default process model but there are uncertainties in the input parameters, limitations of data and various numerical approximations that affect the quality of the results. In addition, a narrow range of portfolios are investigated. Liquidity Horizon: Adjusting for liquidity effects using ratings data implies that going from a 12-month liquidity horizon to a 1-month liquidity horizon while keeping a 12-month capital horizon reduces capital around 30% while using a simple market based approach reduces capital around 40%. In comparison, the ratings-based approach reduces capital around 20% when moving from a 12 mo

文档评论(0)

ailuojue + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档