- 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
AssessingAlternativeAssumptionsonDefaultRiskCapitalinthe.doc
Assessing Alternative Assumptions on Default Risk Capital in the Trading Book
December 12, 2006
Gary Dunn: UK Financial Services Authority
Michael Gibson: Federal Reserve Board
Gloria Ikosi: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Jonathan Jones: Office of Thrift Supervision
Charles Monet: US Securities and Exchange Commission
Michael Sullivan: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
I. Objective
In this paper, we illustrate the range of potential default losses for trading books across a range of possible assumptions. These results are also compared with A-IRB capital requirements. The intent of this analysis is not to specify the “correct” set of assumptions for computing default risk in the trading book, since each firm will make its own assumptions in modeling default losses in its trading book. Instead, we examine the sensitivity of default risk capital to the choice of alternative modeling assumptions.
The Revised Accord requires firms to model incremental default risk in the trading book. In this paper, we consider only capital for default risk and do not consider the impact of adjustments for double counting of default risk and spread risk. We will consider this issue in a separate analysis, which we intend to prepare in the near future.
II. Summary of Findings
Disclaimer: These results are indicative rather than authoritative. We used a standard default process model but there are uncertainties in the input parameters, limitations of data and various numerical approximations that affect the quality of the results. In addition, a narrow range of portfolios are investigated.
Liquidity Horizon: Adjusting for liquidity effects using ratings data implies that going from a 12-month liquidity horizon to a 1-month liquidity horizon while keeping a 12-month capital horizon reduces capital around 30% while using a simple market based approach reduces capital around 40%. In comparison, the ratings-based approach reduces capital around 20% when moving from a 12 mo
您可能关注的文档
- 2網界博覽會.ppt
- 2药对发散风寒.ppt.ppt
- 2限位浮点数的表示.doc
- 2,4二硝基苯肼比色法测定维生素C的含量.ppt
- 3-1脂肪烃.ppt
- 3.1-3.2液气压能源装置.pps.ppt
- 3.2.1(牙醫)-台南市牙醫師公會.doc
- 3.2测点布置-中国力学学会.doc
- 3.Apractical(clinical)internship.doc
- 3.《半张纸》教学设计(ppt).ppt
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)练习试题附带答案.docx
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)练习试题含答案讲解.docx
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)考前冲刺检测卷包括详细解答.docx
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)考前冲刺检测卷附有答案详解.docx
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)考前冲刺练习题库提供答案解析.docx
- 卫生招聘考试之卫生招聘(计算机信息管理)考前冲刺练习题库附有答案详解.docx
- 演出经纪人之演出经纪实务综合提升测试卷包括详细解答.docx
- 演出经纪人之演出经纪实务综合提升练习题附答案.docx
- 演出经纪人之演出经纪实务考前冲刺练习题附答案详解.docx
- 2022-2023年演出经纪人之演出经纪实务通关练习题库提供答案解析.docx
文档评论(0)