PROBIOTC BACTERIAL OVERGROWTH.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PROBIOTC BACTERIAL OVERGROWTH

MEDICINA?- Volumen 62 - No 2, 2002 MEDICINA (Buenos Aires) 2002; 62: 159-163 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? PROBIOTIC BACTERIAL OVERGROWTH ? EFFECT OF LACTOBACILLUS STRAINS (L. CASEI AND L. ACIDOPHILLUS STRAINS CERELA) ON BACTERIAL OVERGROWTH-RELATED CHRONIC DIARRHEA DAVID GAON1, 2, 3, CARMEN GARMENDIA2, NORBERTO O. MURRIELO3, ALFREDO DE CUCCO GAMES3, ANGEL CERCHIO3, RICARDO QUINTAS1, SILVIA N. GONZALEZ4, GUILLERMO OLIVER4 1Cátedra de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires; 2ELMA (Empresa Líneas Marítimas Argentinas), Buenos Aires; 3Hospital Espa?ol, Buenos Aires; 4CERELA (Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos), San Miguel de Tucumán Abstract Small bowel bacterial overgrowth and related diarrhea is a condition that frequently accompanies anatomic disorders, surgically created blind loops or strictures with partial small bowel obstruction and although it is often controlled with antimicrobial therapy, alternative treatment may be needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an oral probiotic preparation of 2 viable lyophilized strains of lactobacilli (1.5 g each) compared with placebo.Twenty two patients with proven overgrowth and chronic diarrhea are described. In random order and double-blind fashion, 2 groups of patients received identical capsules with both Lactobacillus casei and L. acidophillus strains CERELA (12 patients) (LC) and placebo (10 patients) (P) during three consecutive periods of 7 days each followed by a similar three periods of control after withdrawal. At the end of each period the mean daily number of stools, glucose breath H2 test, and symptoms were considered. Lactobacillus were investigated in feces in both groups at day 0 (baseline), on day 21 of treatment with LC and P and on day 21 after withdrawal. Compared with P a significant reduction in mean daily number of stools was achieved with LC (p 0.005) at 15 days, and (p 0.0005) at 21 days and the effect was sustained at 7 days and 15 days (p 0.005) a

文档评论(0)

yuerang3062 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档