看看美国大学怎样对师分类评价.docxVIP

At present, the County personnel totaled 93,000 people, is three times times of 2010. Review the work of the past five years, the County formed to encourage innovation, innovation, participation in innovative atmosphere, a large number of innovations emerging high-level personnel leading the increasingly strong role; innovative idea further innovations gradually expanded from economic to social governance, public safety, intelligence and other areas of urban construction, innovation and talent support becomes increasingly important. Of hard work, the county levels to cherish, continue to consolidate, improve and, for the future development, to remain sober-minded, scientific foresight, courage to play. Under the influence of complicated international and domestic situation, the domestic economic situation, and General Secretary of stability, but downward pressure on large trend of differentiation and deepening of structural adjustment sums up the current situation. From Dongping actual see, Thirteen-Five during, County faced stable economic growth, and deepening structure adjustment of double task, both faced with economic total small, and per capita level low, and industry structure not reasonable, and economic development way extensive, basic situation, more has industry cluster early now prototype, and Park hosted capacity constantly enhanced, and resources traffic location advantage increasingly appeared, and cadres masses innovation venture passion 看看美国大学怎样对教师分类评价 科学网上有较多关于高校教师职称、科研与教学关系、科研评价、教学评价等等问题的讨论，也有海外的教授们介绍美国、欧洲和澳洲的情况。我感到需要有一个较详细的例证让读者直接看到在美国的大学体制下对教师的评价细则。当然，如果举哈佛或者麻省理工学院这样的学校为例可能与中国高校没有多少可比性。本文以一所在美国排名于第三方阵的公立大学为例，其水准与我国一些不错的大学是大约可以比较的。我曾为该校微生物系评审晋升教授的书面材料，系主任邀请时把该系的评价条例作为附件供外审专家参考。在向网友介绍之前，先征得了该系主任的同意，并承诺不透露任何该所大学和受评人员的信息。他了解了我的意图又把条例的最新版本发给我。这里，先介绍该系旧版的评价条例，因为我觉得这份条例对分类评价有更清楚的体现。 美国大学对教授的聘任是“个性化”的，每个人在教学/指导、研究、服务三方面约定的工作量是不同的而且适时调整的。譬如，某年某教授的工作量是教学15% / 指导12% / 研究68% / 服务5%，之后逐年调整，几年后成为教学44% / 指导11% / 研究40% / 服务5%。当然也有只教学没有科研任务的，或者只搞科研没有教学任务的人员。那么，怎