Evaluation演讲点评比赛-裁判简明参考_v1.docVIP

演讲比赛评审标准分析质量 40分 点评者的分析应具体精简，以条理分明的方式指出表现的优点和缺点，评语中肯而合逻辑。 Clear, focused Analytical Quality refers to the effectiveness of the evaluation. Every evaluation should carefully analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the speaker’s presentation. Were the evaluator’s comments clear and logical? Did the evaluator identify specific strengths and weaknesses of the presentation? 建 议（30分）正面、、有帮助不仅指出的优点与缺点，还要提供具体改进的方法。建议要可行、积极正面，指出改进的方向，帮助演讲者精益求精。 Recommendations positive,specific,helpful Recommendations are an important part of an evaluation. An evaluation not only points out the strength and weakness of a speech, he/she also offers specific recommendations for improvement. Recommendations should be practical, helpful and positive, and they should enable the speaker to improve his or her next presentation. 技　　巧（15分）认同、体察入微、激励在提出建议时，要能体会演讲者的与需求，者。 Technique Sympathetic, sensitive, motivational Technique refers to the manner in which the evaluator presents his/her comments and recommendations. An evaluator should be sensitive to the feelings and needs of the speaker, yet inspire and encourage the speaker in his/her future speaking efforts. 总 结（15分）简洁、鼓舞概括评语、提出建议和鼓励，促使演讲者继续努力改进． Summation Concise, encouraging Summation is how the evaluator concludes the evaluation. The conclusion should briefly summarize the evaluator’s comments and suggestions, and be positive and encouraging. 裁判守则’s Code of Ethics 评判应自觉地避免受到任何偏见的影响，不要考虑参赛者所代表的母会、地区，也不要考虑参赛者的年龄、性别、种族、宗教、职业、政治立场等。评审结果应以完全客观的态度产生。 Judges will consciously avoid bias of any kind in selecting first, second and third place contestants. They will not consider any contestant’s club, area, division or district affiliation. Nor will they consider any contestant’s age, sex, race, creed, national origin, profession or political beliefs. They will demonstrate the utmost objectivity. 评判在评审时，不为参赛者计时（有专门的计时员）。 Judges will not time the speeches and will not consider the possibility of under-time or overtime when judging a contestant’