- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
4. The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend. Of the two leading real estate firms in our town?Adams Realty and Fitch Realty?Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitchs $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty.
在本市的两家最大的房地产经纪公司--Adams Realty和Fitch Realty--之中,Adams 显然更优秀一些。Adams有40 名房地产经纪人,而Fitch 只有25 个,且很多是兼职工作。而且,Adams 去年的收入是Fitch 的两倍,其平均房价为$168000,而Fitch 仅为$144000。在Adams 销售的房屋卖得也更快:十年前,我把我的房产交给Fitch,它用了四个多月才卖出去;去年,我在Adams 卖了另一处房产,仅用一个月就售出了。因此,要想让你的房产卖的更快更好,你应该选择Adams。
1, Selective sample:样本选择,一部分被排除在外
One major problem is about the sample the author studied in the survey. The author considers only... selective sub-groups lthough the sub-groups the author studied do constitute a significant part of the whole general population , many other sub-groups are actually excluded from the survey. Perhaps...or...without ruling out all the possibilities above, the author could not make any general conclusion about...merely based on selective sub-groups .
7, Vague data:数据模糊—没有基数
The information concerning ...is not accurate enough for us to evaluate the actual condition of ...The author only informs us that the percentage/fraction of sub-groups which...but we do not know the base amount of the general group if the base amount or corresponding fractions vary, the conclusion would be different. For lack of detailed information about the base amount / fraction of ... we can hardly assess ...
11, False analogy:错误类比AB,A适合B
In the argument the author r
文档评论(0)