自然规律和生物技术的买卖LAWS OF NATURE AND THE BUSINESS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY.docVIP

自然规律和生物技术的买卖LAWS OF NATURE AND THE BUSINESS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
自然规律和生物技术的买卖LAWS OF NATURE AND THE BUSINESS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Source: Legal Secondary Legal Law Reviews Journals Law Reviews, CLE, Legal Journals Periodicals, Combined Terms: physical transformation (Edit Search | Suggest Terms for My Search) Select for FOCUS? or Delivery 24 Santa Clara Computer High Tech. L.J. 275, * Copyright (c) 2008 Santa Clara Computer High Technology Law Journal Santa Clara Computer High Technology Law Journal January, 2008 24 Santa Clara Computer High Tech. L.J. 275 LENGTH: 32423 words ARTICLE: 自然规律和生物技术的买卖LAWS OF NATURE AND THE BUSINESS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY NAME: Philip McGarrigle+ Vern Norviel++ BIO: + Adjunct Professor at Santa Clara University. Vice President and Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Affymetrix, Inc. ++ Adjunct professor at Santa Clara University. Partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati. Mr. McGarrigle and Mr. Norviel work for entities that filed amicus briefs in the LabCorp appeal. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Affymetrix, Inc., or Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati. SUMMARY: ... An appeal entitled LabCorp v. Metabolite raised the product of nature exception to patentability, but this issue was not decided by the full court. ... For example, among other questions, he asked: does a process always require transformation; is it sufficient that energy be transformed; will the use of a general purpose machine always make a claim statutory, even when the machine is old; when will a physical step convert the claim into statutory subject matter; is State Street Bank limited to transformation of data by a machine; and what is the definition of useful, concrete, and tangible? The issue to be decided on appeal will relate to the requirement for a physical transformation or physical device in the claims versus the application of the useful, concrete, and tangible result test without a machine. ... HIGHLIGHT: Abstract The Supreme Court has shown an interest in the In

文档评论(0)

yaobanwd + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档