契约关系.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
契约关系

Question 1 What is the difference between a contract of service and a contract for services? 1.a contract of service:an employee with an employment contract a contract for services: an independent contractor, who provides services to clients 2. 区别:employee享有更多权利,得到更多法律保护,包括statement of contract, reasonable notice, against unfair dismissal, maternity leave等。 Question 2 With reference to Question 1 above, what kind of contract does Cameron have withTartan Transport PLC? A contract for services. (an independent contractor) 举一个案例 Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions [1968] Hall v Lorimer [1992] MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council [2001] MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council [2001] 案情:Mrs MacFarlane and Mrs Skivington had previously worked as gymnastic instructors for Glasgow City Council on a casual basis when in 1992 the Council attempted to regularise the relationship by sending them a document setting out their terms of engagement. Both declined to sign the document. In 1998, Mrs M and Mrs S claimed unfair dismissal. 结论:It is held that just because a gymnastic instructor could arrange a replacement from a register maintained by the council, if she was unable to attend, did not mean she could not be an employee Question 3 Will the company be liable to the passengers for the injuries caused by Cameron’s negligence? 公司不承担责任 原因:Vicarious liability是雇主( employer )对雇员( employee )工作中的行为承担责任,案中的Cameron是independent contractor,不是employee 介绍以下案例 Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd [1947] 只有两种情况下Hirer of independent contractor需要承担责任 A) 他明知此人(contractor)没有能力做这样的工作 B) Contractor 是按照hirer的具体指示做的 Mersey Docks Harbour Board v. Coggins Griffiths (Liverpool) Ltd 案情:Coggins and Griffiths hired a crane and driver from the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board. the driver, Mr Newall, drove the crane negligently and trapped Mr Mcfarlane injuring him. The contract between the Board and the hirers stated that the driver was to become their emplo

文档评论(0)

sd44055 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档