P-T-23-CaliforniaUnemploymentInsuranceAppeals.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
P-T-23-CaliforniaUnemploymentInsuranceAppeals.doc

BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD In the Matter of: SACRAMENTO PROFESSIONAL PRECEDENT NURSES, INC. TAX DECISION (Petitioner) No. P-T-437 Case No. T-84-119 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Office of Appeals No. S-T-11586 The Department appealed from the decision of the administrative law judge which held that under the doctrine of collateral estoppel the Department is estopped from denying that the nurses whose remuneration formed the base of an assessment against the petitioner were independent contractors and not employees of the petitioner. STATEMENT OF FACTS On November 19, 1975, the petitioner, a nonprofit corporation exempt from federal income taxes as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, filed articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of California setting forth the general purposes of the organization. In essence, the organization is a group of registered nurses and licensed vocational nurses who have joined together as an incorporated association to assist each other in securing work with hospitals and other care facilities in the greater Sacramento community and to promote and enhance professional standards. Sometime during the early part of 1982, one Jacklyn F. Jennings filed a claim for unemployment benefits listing the petitioner as her most recent employer. The petitioner immediately responded indicating that Jennings was a self-employed individual and that the corporation did not have any employees as such. The Departments auditing section then conducted an investigation to determine the employment status, if any, existing between Jennings and the corporation. As a result of the audit and investigation a determination was made that Jennings was in fact an employee and a notice to that effect was mailed on April 5, 1982. An appeal was filed by the petitioner to the Departments determination and a hearing was held on Jun

文档评论(0)

ailuojue3 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档