聚硅氧烷与氟碳对比.docVIP

丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆与氟碳面漆性能对比 Comparison Table Acrylic Polysiloxane vs. Fluorocarbon 性能 Properties 丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆 Acrylic Polysiloxane Finish 氟碳面漆 Fluorocarbon Finish 保光性和保色性 Gloss and color Retention 丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆具有非常好的保光性和保色性。 经过10000小时的人工紫外线照射，还能够保持70%的光泽度 经过1年的室外暴露，色彩差别(E小于1 （(E1意味着人的肉眼分辨不出颜色的变化） Acrylic Polysiloxane has excellent gloss and color retention. About 70% gloss retention after 10000 hours QUV-A exposure. (E1 after 1 year exposure. 3000小时的实验表明一些氟碳面漆具有与聚硅氧烷面漆基本相当的保光性和保色性。但是，氟碳面漆的性能很大程度上取决于氟的含量。日本标准JIS K5869中规定氟在固体粘接剂中的最小含量为15%。一般来讲，三氟面漆的耐老化性能要差；四氟面漆的耐老化性能与丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆相接近。 3000 hours QUV-A exposure test showed that some Fluorocarbon finishes had equivalent gloss and color retention. However, the level of performance is dependent upon Fluorine content. JIS K5869 defines that the minimum level of Fluorine resin in solid binder is 15% and note that F3 materials are poor, F4 materials are equivalent to acrylic polysiloxane. 防腐蚀能力 Corrosion resistance 丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆不仅仅具有优异的抗老化性能，而且还具有很好的抗腐蚀性能： 作为面漆获得了挪威独立第三方的防腐性能检测 Norsok M-501。 Acrylic Polysiloxane has not only very good durability, but also has excellent anti-corrosive performance: As a finish of high performance system, acrylic polysiloxane had obtained independent cyclic corrosion test NORSOK M-501 氟碳面漆可以替代多道漆系统中聚氨酯面漆，但是其防腐性能只能建立在多道漆系统之上。单道氟碳面漆具有很有限的防腐性能。从工艺上来讲，早期的氟碳是必须要在车间高温固化才能保证性能的稳定，开发了常温固化的产品以后，性能的不稳定导致其防腐性能的降低。 Can be used to replace the polyurethane topcoats in multi-coat system, but performance must be established in a multi coat system. Fluorocarbon finish alone has limited corrosion resistance. Unstability of the property lead poor performance for the curing under normal temperature. 性能 Properties 丙烯酸聚硅氧烷面漆 Acrylic Polysiloxane Finish 氟碳面漆 Fluorocarbon Finish 体积固体份 Volume solid 70% - 80% 高的体积固体含量意味着高的涂布率，降低每平方米的造价。 High volume solid means high coverage，low cost per square meter. 30 - 40% 低固体含量意味着大量有害气体的排放, 对环境和人体带来危害. 并意味着每平面需要喷涂更多的涂料, 即低涂布率. Low volume solide means high VOC, low coverage for applicat