异位妊娠的不同保守治疗方法的临床探究.docVIP

异位妊娠的不同保守治疗方法的临床探究 　　摘要：目的 探究异位妊娠的不同保守治疗方法。方法 研究对象是2013年9月～2015年4月从我院接收并治疗的异位妊娠患者中随机性抽取的120例，分为三组。分别为介入治疗，腹腔镜保守治疗和药物治疗，每组各40例，分析不同治疗方法的效果。结果 介入治疗组的患者平均住院时间为（9.5±1.02）d，明显低于腹腔镜保守治疗组和药物治疗组（P0.05）；介入治疗组的患者7d血β-HCG下降幅度为98.17%，明显高于腹腔镜保守治疗组和药物治疗组（P0.05）；介入治疗组的患者患侧输卵管通畅率为89.87%，，明显高于腹腔镜保守治疗组和药物治疗组（P0.05）。介入治疗组的患者治疗总有效率为87.5%，明显高于腹腔镜保守治疗组和药物治疗组（P0.05）。以上差异具有统计学意义。结论 介入治疗法治疗异位妊娠，相比腹腔镜保守治疗和药物治疗而言，治疗总有效率高，适用症广泛，能够恢复患者的输卵管功能，有效地保全患者的生育能力，值得临床推广应用。 　　关键词：异位妊娠；不同保守治疗；临床 　　Abstract：Objective To explore the different conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods The research object is in September 2013 to April 2015 from our hospital during the period of receiving and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in patients with random sampling， 120 cases， and were retrospectively studied， divided into three groups， respectively， for intervention， laparoscopic conservative treatment and medication， 40 cases in each group， analysis the effect of different treatment methods and characteristics. Results The patients with interventional treatment group average hospitalization time was （9.5±1.02） d， significantly lower than the laparoscopic conservative treatment and medication group （P0.05）； Intervention in the treatment group patients with blood beta HCG 7 days decreased to 98.17%， significantly higher than the laparoscopic conservative treatment and medication group（P0.05）； Intervention in the treatment group of patients suffering from side tubal patency rate was 89.87%， and significantly higher than the laparoscopic conservative treatment and medication group （P0.05）. Intervention in the treatment group patients healed in all 18 cases， a total of 12 cases were markedly effective， effective in all 7 cases， treatment the total effective rate was 87.5%， significantly higher than the laparoscopic conservative treatment and medication group （P0.05）. The above difference is statistically significant. Conclusion Interventional therapy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy， compared with th