- 19
- 0
- 约2.09万字
- 约 22页
- 2016-10-14 发布于北京
- 举报
Cognitiveamp;CommunicativePrincipleandtheInterpretationofBridgingAnaphora.doc
Cognitive Communicative Principle and the Interpretation of Bridging Anaphora
Abstract
Bridging anaphora, a usual phenomenon in daily communication, is characterized by the anaphoric expressions which are definite noun phrases. This process can be interpreted as the search for relevance by communicators. Cognitive Principle claims that humans intuitively concentrate their minds on relevance and Communicative Principle provides bases for identifying the referents. Bridging anaphora can be expounded cognitively under the framework of Relevance Theory.
Key words: Bridging anaphora; Cognitive and communicative principle; Relevance
INTRODUCTION
As one of the categories of indirect anaphora, bridging anaphora, focusing on the cases in which the anaphors are only definite noun phrases, cannot be resolved solely on the basis of the propositional form (what is said) of the statement, but requires the hearer to “bridge” the gap between the anaphor and the antecedent and using cognitive inferences to acquire the truly conveyed meaning (what is implied), which can be said as one of the most challenging jobs in indirect anaphoric resolution. That is to say, interpreting bridging anaphora involves more than identifying the information clearly expressed, it covers providing the more relevant assumptions to those that have already been processed. Relevance Theory includes the cognitive theories as well as the features for utterances in communication and it argues that humans are relevance-oriented in communication. As bridging anaphora is an active phenomenon in daily communication, it is more reasonable to be interpreted within the framework of Relevance Theory.
1. BRIDGING ANAPHORA
The term “bridging” was introduced by the psycholinguist H. H. Clark in 1977 (he terms this kind of phenomenon as bridging reference) to describe the process “by which the existence of a referent which has not itself been explicitly mentioned is inferred from something which is exp
您可能关注的文档
- 2012年永州烤烟生产气候条件分析.doc
- 2012年河南省农作物主要病虫害发生特点及原因分析.doc
- 2012年玉米配方施肥校验试验总结.doc
- 2013发型潮流趋势 焕然一新 律动色彩.doc
- 2013年1至6月全省及省级基金预算执行情况.doc
- 2013年上半年四川民族自治地方经济发展较快.doc
- 2013年北京市中考作文题解与例析.doc
- 2013年度旅游大奖评选酒店展评.doc
- 2013年春季小麦管理技术措施.doc
- 2013年江西省高考文综历史试题分析与感悟.doc
- 广东省广州省实验中学教育集团2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州大学附属中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期奥班期中物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十六中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十九中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第二中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十六中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中物理试题(解析版).docx
- 广东省广州市第八十九中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(含答案).docx
- 广东省广州市第二中学2025-2026学年八年级上学期期中考试物理试题(解析版).docx
- 2026《中国人寿上海分公司营销员培训体系优化研究》18000字.docx
- 《生物探究性实验教学》中小学教师资格模拟试题.docx
原创力文档

文档评论(0)