ansys电磁力比较.docVIP

ansys 2d电磁力受力分析比较 所用apdl fini /cle /filname,pingbi,1 /title,lovz /prep7 /format,,f,18,9 r1=0.464 r2=0.5115 l=0.355 i=165 n=14526 s=l*(r2-r1) j=n*i/s rd1=0.18 rd2=0.18 rd3=0.18 r4=0.9 r5=0 ld=-0.636 !et et,1,53,,,1 et,2,110,,,1 mp,murx,1,1 mp,murx,2,1 mat,3 mpread,emagSa1010,SI_MPL,D:\Program Files\ANSYS Inc\v140\ansys\matlib\,LIB !model /pnum,area,1 rect,r1,r2,-l/2,l/2 rect,r5,r4,ld,0.636 rect,r5,r4+rd2,ld-rd1,0.636+rd3 rect,0,1.5,-1.5,1.5 rect,0,3,-3,3 rect,0,6,-6,6 aovlap,all aglue,all numcmp,all aplot allsel aatt,1,,1 asel,,,,1 aatt,2,,1 asel,,,,2 aatt,3,,1 asel,,,,5 aatt,1,,2 allsel asel,,,,5 asel,inve smrt,1 amesh,all allsel asel,,,,5 asel,inve lsel,s,ext lsel,u,loc,x,0 lccat,all allsel lsel,s,ext lsel,u,loc,x,0 lccat,all allsel smrt,off esize,,1 amesh,5 aref,1,2,1,2 allsel *get,lmax,line,,num,max ldele,lmax-1,lmax,,1 allsel /sol lsel,s,ext lsel,u,loc,x,0 nsll,s,1 sf,all,inf allsel nsel,s,loc,x,0 d,all,az,0 allsel esel,s,mat,,2 bfe,all,js,,,,j allsel esel,s,mat,,3 cm,arm,elem fmagbc,arm esel,s,mat,,2 cm,coil,elem fmagbc,coil allsel magsolv,0,4,0.0001,,25 /post1 plnsol,b,sum plf2d,100 nc=node(0,0,0) *get,b_center,node,nc,b,sum mur=1.256e-6 etab,,nmisc,1 sadd,uu,nmis1,,1/mur pletab,uu,avg path,c1,2,30,200 ppath,1,,,0 ppath,2,,,-2 pdef,,b,y,noav prpath,by fmagsum,arm,coil 模型图示 如右，一铁轭与电流线圈，铁轭对称，理论上铁轭受力为0；但由于中心磁场略大，约为3.2T，所以受力的误差相对放大，有点不可接受。 现对各种处理做一比较，方便以后更好的对其进行控制。 网格比较 1)粗略网格 smrt,1 较细网格 plane53 magsolv,0,4,0.0001,,25 smrt,1$amesh,all$aref,all,,,2 更细网格 plane 53 magsolv,0,4,0.0001,,25 smrt,1 amesh,all aref,all,,,2 可见，细致网格能提高求解电磁力的精度，通过查看求解时的收敛曲线，可以看到细致网格降低了磁电流段的收敛误差。另外，可以看出虚功力的要比麦克斯韦力准确点。一般来说，网格密度足够时，虚功力和麦克斯韦力相差无几。 单元比较 plane13单元 magsolv,0,4,0.0001,,25 smrt,1 amesh,all aref,all,,,2 与3-3）比较，可见准确度没有53单元好。13为4节点单元；53为8节点单元，拥有中间节点，有个233单元，貌似也差不多。CSG收敛程度和网格密度一致，但53要少一半单元。13单元可以用作磁结构耦合。 MAGSOLV, OPT, NRAMP, CNVCSG, CNVFLUX, NEQIT, BIOT,CNVTOL 5、对magsolvcnvcsg项的设置比较 plane 53 amrt,1$amesh,all$aref,all,,,2 magsolv,0,4,0.0001,,25 ma