罗立毕业论文说者悖论.docVIP

目录 摘要 2 Abstract: 2 引言 1 第一章、说谎者悖论的形成和发展 3 1.1说谎者悖论的历史形成 3 1.2说谎者悖论地发展 3 第二章、各种说谎者悖论解决方案的简介及评述 4 2.1 罗素的解决方案 4 2.2 塔尔斯基的解决方案 5 2.3 克里普克地解决方案 6 2.4 赫茨伯格的解决方案 8 2.5张建军教授的观点 10 2.6黄展骥的观点 11 第三章几种解悖方案评说 12 3.1解悖方案的积极意义 12 3.2解悖方案的不足之处 14 3.3自己的解悖思路 17 结语 19 参考文献 20 致谢 21 附录 22 浅评说谎者悖论 哲学 2007级 罗立 摘要：说谎者悖论既是历史上最古老的悖论，又是最典型的语义悖论，被逻辑学者们普遍认为是在研究语义悖论时所致力要攻克的对象。自上世纪以来解决悖论成了逻辑学界的一大热门课题，早在中世纪时,在欧洲保罗(P(N(Venetus)、布里丹(J(Buridan)和阿尔伯特(Albert of Saxony)等逻辑学先驱就已经研究过说谎者悖论为主体的语义悖论及其各种变体。后来,出现罗素的分支类型论、塔尔斯基的语言层次论、克里普克的真值空缺论、赫茨伯格的素朴语义学为典型代表的解悖方案。我们国内学者也时常就这个话题各抒己见。不可否认这些方案对逻辑学等学科的发展都做出了重大贡献，极大地促进了逻辑学等学科的发展和进步，但是，对于说谎者悖论一直都不能形成一个公认的或者统一的、完善的、无可争议的解决方案，都存在不同程度上的的瑕疵，换句话说就是并没有完美的解决方案，为此要形成成功的解决方案，必须抓住说谎者悖论的主要矛盾进行研究，这样才能从本质上解决说谎者悖论甚至是这一类的语义悖论。作为一个逻辑学门外汉，我只能就其中的一些观点进行浅薄地评述。 中文关键词:说谎者悖论、解悖方案、本质问题 Shallow review of the liar paradox (Public management academy 2007 Philosophy LuoLi) Abstract:The liar paradox is not only the world’s oldest paradox in the human history but also the most topical one. It is universally thought as the object that all logic researchers are committed in since the last century. To solve this paradox is one of the hot topics in the field of logic early in the Mid-Age, Logic pioneers as P(N(Venetus.J(Buridan and Albert of Saxony in Europe have already devoted to Semantic paradox centered on liar paradox and its varieties. Then there have come into being different topical problem solving schemes as the vicious principle of Bertrant(Russell, the speech hierarchy theory of Alfred Tarski、the null vacancy theory of Soul(Kripke and simple semantics of H(G(Hertzberger Afterwards, there have emerged. another four vigorous paradox solving schemes of context dull, context sensitive, inconsistent logic and paraconsistent logic. Equally, scholars of your own country often provide various views on this topic undoubtedly(?), All these solving schemes make great contributions to the development and advancement on many subjects, especially logic However, not all scholars could form a u