TEC-101031-4.pptVIP

* TEC Controller 實圖 圖18.TEC Controller實圖 * 90mm 65mm 24mm 40x40mm 致冷晶片結合熱管性能測試之冷凝部治具 圖19.致冷晶片結合熱管性能測試之冷凝部治具 * 致冷晶片結合熱管性能測試之冷凝部治具 圖20. .致冷晶片結合熱管性能測試之冷凝部治具實圖 * 實驗架設圖 圖21. 致冷晶片結合熱管性能測試之冷凝部實圖 * Qin W Win W dT Qout W Heat Loss % 24 5 0.2 21.5 10 26 7.09 1.6 23.7 9.4 28 9.18 3 25.5 8.9 30 11.84 4 27.75 7.5 32 14.5 5 30 6.2 34 20 7.54 33 3 36 22 8 34 5 38 28.4 10 36 5.2 40 43.3 12.2 38 5 Table 6. Experiment result for heat pipe performance by using T.E. Cooler ℃ * Fig. 18. Experiment result for heat pipe performance by using T.E. Cooler Dry out at 34W * Table 7. Comparison the maximum heat dissipate of the heat pipe by using water jacket and T.E. Cooler Condenser type Maximum heat dissipate Qmax Heat Loss Qloss % Thermal resistance Test time Water Jacket 34W 10~50 % 0.16 7Hr Auto Control T.E. cooler 34W Within 10% 0.155 3.5Hr Menu Control * To design a heat pipe performance test instrument, the difference between heat dissipate section and heat input section should not too high, the heat loss is general controlled within 10%. This study provide a new method to replace traditional water jacket used on the condenser section of the heat pipe performance test instrument. From performance curve of the T.E., one may easy to control the heat dissipate ability very accuracy. The experiment result shown the Qmax would be the same both at the platforms by using water jacket and by T.E.C,. The thermal resistance calculate difference was within 3% for these two test platforms. It took about 7 hour for automatically control by using the traditional water, while it took only 3.5 hour for manual control by using the T.E.C., the target of this study is expected 20 minutes for the test time. Results * Thanks For Your Attention Tomorrow will be much more better ! * 第十二屆全國熱管會議 12CHPC --中山大學 第十二屆全國熱管會議 12CHPC --中山大學 * 以热电致冷芯片 T.E.C. 取代热管性能量测平台冷凝水套之研究 We are all Family 林唯耕 清华大学工程与系统科学系，台湾 * 熱管性能測試---風冷式 熱管性能測試---水冷式 Water in Water out Tin Tout Heater Watt Meter Variac