Why Anglos Lead知识点.docVIP

Why Anglos Lead From the Winter 2005-2006 issue | More Lawrence Mead | December 1, 2005 OVER THE last few years, due to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, many commentators have discerned the emergence of a new American empire. Some critics blame the Bush Administration, arguing that, but for Bush, there would be no crisis over American unilateralism or hegemony. Others blame the end of the Cold War for unleashing America on the world. Actually, American pre-eminence extends much further back--to World War II or before. It really continues a British primacy that dated back at least to 1815. During the 20th century, Germany, Japan and Soviet Russia challenged the Anglo ascendancy, but they were turned back. So today the world order bears a remarkable resemblance to the late Victorian era. Now as then, the world is globalizing, and English is its lingua franca. The United States has merely supplanted Britain as the leading power. American primacy is not an accident of this or that administration. It reflects the special capacity of English-speaking countries to lead the world order. These Anglo nations, or the Anglos as I will call them, include Britain and the chief territories that were settled initially from Britain--pre-eminently the United States but also Australia, Canada and New Zealand. What makes a country Anglo is that its original settler population came mainly from Britain. So even though a minority of Americans today have British roots, they inherit a political culture initially formed by the British. Some other countries that Britain ruled, such as India or South Africa, are not Anglo in this sense because British settlers never formed the bulk of their populations. They may be English-speaking, and their public institutions have British roots, but British culture did not form the society as it did in the Anglo countries. The Anglo nations--singly or in concert--have taken a special responsibility for the world order. Somehow, they are available to