英语辩论赛终板.docVIP

餐饮业是一种历史久远的服务行业，随着商品经济的迅速发展，伴随餐饮类服务业而生的“开瓶费”逐渐走进人们的视野，并成为消费者与商家争论不休的焦点，关于餐饮企业是否应向消费者收取开瓶费虽然在我国现有的法律中并未有明确规定，但是我方坚持认为酒店收取开瓶费是不合理的。 The catering industry is a long history of service industry, with the rapid development of commodity economy, and students with catering service industry corkage fee gradually into peoples vision, and become a debated focus between consumers and businesses on food enterprises, whether should to the consumer to charge corkage fee although there are clear provisions in the our existing law does not, but I insist that the hotel corkage fee charged is not reasonable.  开瓶费，Corkage fee, is the consumer to have dinner in a restaurant, if own drinks, charge the hotel to consumers due to provide open the bottle, pour wine and other services to its cost. In fact, a corkage fee is the catering enterprises to consumers extra charge service fees. The consumer to the hotel for consumption, have paid the relevant fees to the hotel restaurant, but the hotel also to consumers extra charge, which is obviously unreasonable. So I insist that, the hotel corkage fee charged is not reasonable. 首先，从消费者角度上来说，酒店收取开瓶费实际上是违反了消费者的公平交易权和自主选择权。因为很多酒店明确规定“谢绝自带酒水”，并且对消费者带进来的酒水收取开瓶费或是服务费，更重要的是，饭店出售的酒水的价钱比外面市场出售的同样的产品要贵的多，这种不合理的价钱不仅是违背了市场竞争规则，而且严重侵犯了消费者的自主选择权和公平交易权。 First of all, from the consumer perspective, the hotel corkage fee charged is actually violated even bargain rights of consumers and the right to choose independently. Because a lot of the hotel clearly defined declined own drinks, and for consumers to bring in drinks corkage fee charged or service charges, more importantly, the hotel sells drinks price than the outside market to sell the same products are much more expensive, this is not a reasonable price is not only violated the rules of market competition moreover, a serious violation of the right to choose independently and even bargain rights of consumers.  消费者虽然自带酒水，但是，进入了餐厅，就占用了餐厅的经营场所，享受了餐厅的服务，因此开瓶费实际上是服务的费用，消费者不喝酒也一样享受酒店的服务，单独额外收取开瓶费不合理。 Although