浅析两种锚杆施工技术的不同施工方案中英文.docVIP

浅析两种锚杆施工技术的不同施工方案 Analyses two kinds of different construction schemes of anchor rod construction technology 　近年来，水利水电工程中一些大规模的地下洞室工程越来越多。从跨度与边墙角度来说，地下厂房的规模同以前相比都有了很大的增长。在开挖过程中，对岩体的稳定性会造成一定影响。其中原因有很多，主要由于岩体的应力分布发生了不均匀变化。由于应力分布的重组，产生了塑性区或拉力区。再加上先天地理条件的影响。进而就会导致围岩的松动甚至事故。因此，为了保持岩体稳定，防止工程中出现不必要的损失，需要做好支护工作。 In recent years, some large scale underground caverns in water conservancy and hydropower project engineering more and more. From span and side wall Angle, the size of the underground powerhouse with there were a lot of growth than ever before. In the process of excavation, can cause certain influence to the stability of the rock mass. In which there are many reasons, mainly due to the uneven changes have taken place in the stress distribution of rock mass. Due to the restructuring of the stress distribution, plastic zone and tensile zone. Coupled with the natural geographical conditions. Which will lead to the surrounding rock looseness or even accidents. Therefore, in order to keep the stability of rock mass, to prevent the occurrence of unnecessary loss in the project, the need to do a good job of supporting. 　　本文以某水电站地下厂房为例，主要对普通预应力锚杆施工技术与水泥药卷预应力锚杆施工技术进行了对比，通过探讨分析，最终选择了后者作为本工程的施工方案。 Taking a hydropower station underground factory building as an example, the main of common prestressed construction technology of anchor and cement cartridge prestressed anchor rod construction technology to carry on the contrast, through the analysis, finally chose the latter, as the project construction scheme. 一、工程概况及施工方案处理 A processing, engineering survey and construction scheme 某水电站地下厂房，开挖跨度为25.2米。开挖高度为76.2米。从工程实际角度看，由于地下洞室较多，因而支护措施也不少。原计划采用水泥砂浆预应力锚杆技术，可后来考虑到该方案不管是从施工难度还是从施工成本角度来说都不是最好的。主要因为锚固段进行水泥灌浆之时要考虑到事后的养护问题。养护时间很长，一般在14到16天左右；这样就由于施工难度过大而耽误了下一次开挖的时间。如果要用吊车施工来进行开挖工作，将增大施工成本。而且该工程地质条件也不允许由于养护而耽误张拉时间。最终决定用水泥药卷预应力锚杆施工技术。 A hydropower station underground powerhouse, the excavation span of 25.2 meters. Excavation height is 76.2 m. From engineering point of view, for reasons of