A Comparative Analysis of Casual Conversation and Institutional Talk.docVIP

A Comparative Analysis of Casual Conversation and Institutional Talk.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
A Comparative Analysis of Casual Conversation and Institutional Talk.doc

A Comparative Analysis of Casual Conversation and Institutional Talk   Abstract: This article reflects on the process of transcribing spoken interaction and makes a comparative analysis of two different varieties of spoken interaction (casual conversation and institutional talk). By doing so, it reveals how the different purposes of speech result in their distinctive characteristics, and shows how language is structured to construct ideational meanings (Field) and interpersonal meanings (Tenor) that define each context. Key words: transcription; comparative analysis; casual conversation; institutional talk   [中图分类号]H030   [文献标识码]A   [文章编号]1006-2831(2014)02-0139-9 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2831.2014.01.037    1. Introduction   Transcription is a valuable tool to “freezeframe a moment”(Rex Schiller, 2009: 10). It offers “previously invisible choices” (Rex Schiller, 2009: 10) to probe into conversations, which would otherwise be evanescent in its original form. Transcription examines both how interactants employ different grammatical, lexical, discourse-organizational, prosodic, and paralinguistic features to negotiate meanings and achieve particular purposes in different domains of life, and how the interpersonal relationship is established, maintained or changed through the conversation. Despite the great value of transcription, it is not a faithful or objective way in which talk can be written. Influenced by the purpose of transcribing, personal language ideology, and the tension between readability and accuracy, transcribers may have different decisions in “what to transcribe and in how much detail” (Eggins, 2000: 148). Therefore, transcription itself is a kind of interpretation and representation (Green, Franquiz Dixon, 1997). A comparison of institutional talk with casual conversation would in particular makes salient their distinctive linguistic and non-linguistic features, showing how these choices enact different social rights and obligations of eac

文档评论(0)

guan_son + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档