学士学位论文---外文翻译 企业社会责任，股权结构和政治干预_来自中国的证据.docVIP

中文4490字 本科毕业论文（设计） 外 文 翻 译 外文题目 Corporate Social Responsibility, OwnershipStructure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China 外文出处 《Journal of Business Ethics》 2010（96）：P631-645 外文作者 Wenjing Li Ran Zhang 原文： Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China Introduction In recent years, there has been growing awareness of the role of corporations in society in an international setting. Among the unresolved issues that deserve attention, Aguilera et al. (2007, p. 837) postulate that an important question in corporate social responsibility (CSR) requiring further attention is ‘‘what catalyzes organizations to engage in increasingly robust CSR initiatives.’’ Prior research studies (Chapple and Moon, 2005; Deniz-Deniz and Garcia-Falcon, 2002; Graves and Waddock, 1994; Johnson and Greening, 1999; Muller and Kolk, 2010; Roberts, 1992; Stanwick and Stanwick, 1998; Zu and Song, 2009) document a link among CSR and ?rm size, pro?tability, corporate governance, leverage, employees, industry, and environmental pressures, e.g., shareholder demands, regulation, or media pressure. Among those studies, Graves and Waddock (1994) and Johnson and Greening (1999) document a relationship between ?rm ownership structure and CSR. Keim (1978), Ullmann (1985), and Roberts (1992) all document a positive relationship between dispersed corporate ownership and CSR disclosure in the context of developed countries. Given the difference in people’s ethical reasoning and decisions between developed and emerging countries (Ge and Thomas, 2007; Lam and Shi, 2008; Whitcomb et al., 1998), does ownership structure also affect CSR in emerging markets such as China? Do the factors that have been previously documented to drive CSR in Anglo-American