北美范文的解题策略汇总.docVIP

北美范文的解题策略汇总 1 基本同意，细节有异议： 1 换位思考与漏洞攻击： 2 引入新概念： 3 具体情况具体分析： 4 分拆命题 4 暴露问题，巩固命题 4 建立价值参照系统： 5 长线短线： 5 语理分析 6 抽象问题具体化 6 挑战二元思维 7 北美范文的解题策略汇总 基本同意，细节有异议： 原则上同意作者观点，但观点涉及到具体问题时有保留。结构上，先肯定大的原则，然后具体讨论那些情况下会有问题。这种策略适合的问题往往有一个大的框架，又有一些特殊的个案。 Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial. I agree with the speakers broad assertion that money spent on research is generally money well invested. However, the speaker unnecessarily extends this broad assertion to embrace research whose results are controversial, while ignoring certain compelling reasons why some types of research might be unjustifiable. My points of contention with the speaker involve the fundamental objectives and nature of research, as discussed below. 作者的立论思路是顺应原命题的结构形成的。首先肯定命题前半部分所提出的大前提，然后对后半部分的特殊情况提出质疑。考生在构思的时候也应该注意观察原命题的结构，从中获得启发，提出有说服力的观点。 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. I agree with the speaker that it is sometimes necessary, and even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. A contrary view would reveal a naivety about the inherent nature of public politics, and about the sorts of compromises on the part of well-intentioned political leaders necessary in order to further the publics ultimate interests. Nevertheless, we must not allow our political leaders undue freedom to with-hold information, otherwise, we risk sanctioning demagoguery and undermining the philosophical underpinnings of any democratic society. 在肯定命题的基础上，作者提出需要警惕的极端情况。一方面承认公共政治对适当隐瞒的需求，另一方面又指出过度隐瞒可能对民主基石的威胁。这种对平衡与妥协的把握，恰好反映了GRE作文所要求的思想深度。 Humanity has made little real progress over the past century or so. Technological innovations have taken place, but the overall condition of humanity is no better. War, violence, and poverty are still with us. Technology cannot change the condition of humanity. Have technological innovations of the last century failed