compilationofcomments10-12-2009(28页).doc

  1. 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
compilationofcomments10-12-2009(28页)

IPC Compilation of Comments IPC-9853 Working Draft Circulation: February 2 – March 15, 2012 No. Commentor Paragraph/ Figure/Table Type of comment (T=Technical or E=Editorial) Recommendation Reason for Recommendation IPC Committee Disposition on each comment submitted (Accept/Not Accept/Withdrawn/ OBE (Overcome by Events) 1 Marc Peo, Heller Industries For the record, Heller Industries opposes all aspects of this spec and endorses a full re-write. 请记录,朗士电子设备公司全面反对本规范,赞同全面重写本规范。 You have seen my comments through the efforts of Coco at BTU so this is a redundant mail but just in case Jeanne is keeping the tally and is not aware of our position we vote NO to ALL of it and endorse the formation of a USA based group to do this properly. 通过BTU公司的Coco,你们已经看到过我的意见。所以我得此封邮件是多余的。以防万一Jeanne没有意识到我们的反对意见,我再次重申我们的立场,并赞同组建一个美国工作组来妥善地完成这个工作 Or, the IPC can take ownership of creating a less biased and commercial spec that follows the tenets of the IPC charter for objectivity and universal utility. 或者,IPC可以独揽制定一个遵循IPC宪章不带偏见的客观而公开的商业规范 Bottom line: this draft should be removed from circulation NOW and considered to be back to clean paper until another draft is presented. 底线:本草案稿应该立即停止传播并考虑全部销毁,从零开始起草。 2 Bjorn Dahle Entire document 整个文件 T Remove any reference to any proprietary commercially available product I do not know whether the concept of a calibration tool is necessary. If it is so deemed, it must be a tool that any interested party can make available to the industry. 删除文件中所有引用的任何品牌的已经市场化的产品的部分。我不知道(对于再流焊炉)校验工具是否有必要。如果确实需要,这个工具必须是业内任何有兴趣者都可以制作销售的。 IPC will loose all credibility if it is seen to endorse and even push the sale of a commercial product. Furthermore, the document appears deceitful by pushing a proprietary product while avoiding to name the product or company. 如果大家看到IPC如此认可并力挺某个商品的销售,IPC将失去所有的公信力。此外,尽管避开指名道姓,力推一个专卖产品,也逃不脱欺诈的嫌疑。 On a more emotional note, I am shocked and disappointed that IPC has allowed itself to become a tool for commercial interests b

文档评论(0)

heti94575 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档