CEA_Frac_Pack_压裂充填优化概要.ppt

Frac-Pack Optimization Using Models ? Or What We Can Do, What We Can’t ! First, A Question A Bit of History3 Dimensions – H/W/L History3 Dimensions – H/W/L 2D Models (i.e., StimPlan QUIK) Specify H(eight), Calculate W(idth)/L(ength) Pseudo-3D Models, Calculate H/W/L Parametric (Lumped) “Cell Type” “Fully” 3D Models, Correctly Calculate H/W/L 2-D Models Advantages Allows Some Theoretical Solutions(i.e., Pressure Analysis) Fast, Simple, Easy Disadvantages Fairly Ridiculous Concept for Design(How do you estimate “H” ?)PNet = f(H) and H = f(PNet) ? H = f(H) ! Uses Preliminary Pressure Analysis Sensitivity Studies/First Economics- History3 Dimensions – H/W/L History3 Dimensions – H/W/L 2D Models Specify H(eight), Calculate W(idth)/L(ength) Pseudo-3D Models, APPROXIMATELY Calculate H/W/L Parametric (Lumped) “Cell Type” “Fully” 3D Models, Correctly Calculate H/W/L Pseudo 3-D (P3D) Models Advantages Readily Usable Puts Questions in terms of “Estimatable” Values Disadvantages Cannot Handle Many Geologic Cases(Thus, often yield “BAD” answers.) Should NOT Question Physics Based onAPPROXIMATE Models ! Uses Main Treatment Design Tool Main Pressure Analysis Tool History3 Dimensions – H/W/L History3 Dimensions – H/W/L 2D Models Specify H(eight), Calculate W(idth)/L(ength) Pseudo-3D Models, Calculate H/W/L Parametric (Lumped) “Cell Type” “Fully” 3D Models, Correctly Calculate H/W/L “Fully” 3-D Models Advantages Treats Realistic Geology Situations Allows Us to Question Physics Disadvantages Computationally Intensive Uses Main Tool for “Complex” Geology “Check” for Simpler Models Fracture ModelingBasic Physics Pretty Simple Material Balance ! Rock Mechanics Fracture Width Frac Height Growth Tip Pressure Momentum Equation Fluid Flow, Dp Along Fracture Proppant Placement But The Targets GetMore More Difficult ! Modeling “Issues”(What Is a Pseudo-3D Model ?) Fracture Width Calculation Fracture Tip Fracture PropagationHeight Length Fluid Loss (Material Balanc