技术壁垒和卫协生议.docVIP

WTO: Technical Barriers and SPS Measures.(Book review). 世贸组织：技术性贸易壁垒和卫生和植物检疫措施。（书评） American Journal of International Law?102.4?(Oct 2008)(2199?words)? Hide details Show details 美国国际法杂志102.4（2008年10月）（ Author(s): Tomer Broude.? Document Type: Magazine/Journal Bookmark: Bookmark this Document Recent years have witnessed an increasingly abundant publication of new legal literature on the World Trade Organization --a welcome development in view of the complexity and relative opaqueness of the WTO Agreements and (no less, if not more so) WTO jurisprudence. As a case in point, the WTOs EC--Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products dispute resulted in a panel report that was approximately 1300 single-spaced pages in length and whose intelligibility remains clouded even to the patient and more expert reader. At the time of this writing, the most recent WTO Appellate Body report-in the continued transatlantic hormones disputes, United States--Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC-Hormones Dispute--is over 300 pages in length, copiously littered with new judicial opinions on enduring legal problems and setting aside many findings of an equally lengthy panel report issued just a few months before. These and other WTO reports do not make for light reading, to say the least, and indeed, each of them has its particular jurisprudential context in the legal history of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the WTO, a context that is, at times, still difficult for students of WTO law, let alone non-WTO specialists, to penetrate. 近年来，在世界贸易组织的新的法律文献中日益丰富的出版物-中的复杂性和世贸组织协定的相对模糊性和（同样，如果不是更多的话）认为值得欢迎的发展世界贸易组织裁决。作为一个例子，世界贸易组织的欧共体-批准和生物技术产品市场营销的争端导致了小组的报告，大约是1300单页长间隔，其清晰度依然笼罩甚至病人和更多的专家读者。在撰写本文时，最新的世贸组织上诉机构报告的时候，在继续大西洋激素争端，美国-继续暂停对欧盟的义务，激素的争议-超过300页的长度，也大量充斥着新的司法在长期的法律问题，并拨出同样长期小组的报告发表意见，许多研究结果仅仅几个月前。这些和其他世贸组织报告不作轻读，至少可以说，事实上，他们都有其特别是在关税和贸易总协定的世界贸易组织，一个方面是，法律的历史背景下的法理有时，还很难对世贸组织法律的学生，更不用说非世贸组织的专家，渗透。 The inaccessibility of these international judicial decisions b