ppt课件-怎 样 在 国 际 权 威 杂 志 上 发 表 科 学 论 文.ppt

4/3/2001 P.J.Hines What Is the Purpose of Doing Research? Basic Elements for Basic Research Good Research Is the Key What Is a First-Class Paper/Research? Should your paper go to CNS? What helps: Convincing data Appropriate controls Careful presentation Consideration of all viable alternatives What doesn’t help The minimal publishable unit. Excessive or unfounded speculation Repeat examples of a known phenomenon Insufficient advance over previously published work Invite thorough critique Run your own review process first ask feedback from someone in your own specialty someone in an unrelated specialty a good editor for the English language Assess both research and presentation Common reasons for rejection Belongs in a specialized journal Too small of an advance over previously published work Unconvincing data Observations without interpretations Interpretations without data Is it a good paper or not? what makes a great paper? Astounding work of great value to its own field and/or to the general readership Common problems resulting in rejection of a manuscript too small of an advance not of general interest/ belongs in specialized journal not scientifically convincing, interpretations poorly supported results not well interpreted, poor context When your paper gets rejected — with review Dear Dr. xx, We received with some surprise your letter of November 4, rejecting this manuscript on the basis of one reviewer’s opinion which you “found persuasive”. We wish to indicate our dissatisfaction with this reviewer’s comments, which appear to ignore the new experiments submitted as part of the revised manuscript. ? This reviewer states: “111.” This was precisely the point of the xxx experiment which indicated that there were no such deficits. This reviewer further states: “222.” Again, this is a mystifying statement as the detailed rebuttal accompanying this letter described the xxx. Did the reviewer not understand that xxx? Finally, concerning the proposal for a xxx e