文本分析的功能语法视角优秀培训书.pptVIP

Subject The lion chased the tourists Finite The lion didn’t chase the tourists. Tagging/Negotiation The lion chased the tourists, didn’t it? * * Mood/Residue The lion︱ chas/ed ︱ the tourists Subj. ︱ Finite/Predicator ︱ Complement Mood ︱ Residue * * Clause as message Textual meta-function Theme-Rheme System The lion ︱chased the tourists in the forest Theme Rheme In the forest ︱ the lion ︱ chased the tourists Theme Theme Rheme Macro-Theme * * ‘3 in 1’ Three mete-function analysis of one clause The lion chased the tourists in the forest Actor Material Goal Circumstance Mo……..od/Residue Theme Rheme * * 3 Metafunctions:Summary Ideational?Transitivity?6 Process types and their meanings Interpersonal?Mood System?Negotiation Textual?Theme-Rheme ? starting point of message * * - circumstances: description Three perspectives of ‘circumstance’ (H + M 2004:260-1): As far as meaning is concerned, we use the express ‘circumstances associated with’ or ‘attendant on the process’, referring to examples such as location of an event in time or space, its manner, or its cause; and these notions of ‘when, where, how and why’ the thing happens provided the traditional explanation, by linking circumstances to the four WH- forms that were adverbs rather than nouns. This ties in with the second perspective, that from the clause itself: whereas participants function in the mood grammar as Subject or Complement, circumstances map onto Adjuncts; in other words, they have not got the potential of becoming Subjects, of taking over the modal responsibility for the clause as exchange. Thirdly, looked at from below, they are typically expressed not as nominal groups but either adverbial groups or prepositional phrases – mostly the latter, since adverbial groups are largely confined to one type, those of Manner. Type Typical probe Example realization subcategory Subcategory probe Extent [enhancing] how__? at what interval? for three hours every three hours