英语专业建设的 释义论组织科学视角.ppt

P for Plausibility Driven by plausibility rather than accuracy: People are cognitively lazy, when they found an answer to the question, people stop searching. No alternatives are evaluated, while people might not even know the half of it. 释义是一种探索，“大概”是它的驱动力，“精确”是它的偶然旅伴。 懒汉会一知半解时歇下，释义者则应永不停蹄！ 10/27-28/2012 华中华南地区2012年英语专业协作会暨学术研讨会（郑州大学） E for Enactment Enactive and sensible environments. In organizational life people often produce part of the environment they face (Pondy Mitroff, 1979). Action is crucial for sensemaking; we can’t command and the environment will obey. Moreover, we can’t predict something that will happen exact, because everything is part of a larger truth. Entity and environment are factors which influence each other. You are neither a plaything in the environment or independent. Somewhere between is the meaning. 10/27-28/2012 华中华南地区2012年英语专业协作会暨学术研讨会（郑州大学） An illustrative example of the 7 generic properties of sensemaking: “Strategic plans are a lot like maps. They animate and orient people. Once people begin to act (enactment), they generate tangible outcomes (cues) in some context (social), and this helps them discover (retrospect) what is occurring (ongoing), what need to be explained (plausibility), and what should be done next (identity enhancement)” (Weick, 1995, p.55). 10/27-28/2012 华中华南地区2012年英语专业协作会暨学术研讨会（郑州大学） So, that’s SIR COPE! Or SIR, shall we COPE? SIR, (let’s) COPE then! Sure! Let’s “lead events that don’t play by the rules!” 10/27-28/2012 华中华南地区2012年英语专业协作会暨学术研讨会（郑州大学） 释义论对英语专业建设有哪些重要启示？ “英语专业建设”属于组织行为和事件，可以也有必要纳入组织科学的范畴思考。 如何进行和开展“英语专业建设”不能凭知觉盲目地干，而需要有组织科学理论指引。 组织（行为和活动）本身不会释义，是组织里的人在释义（Organization itself don’t make sense; it’s we who organize make sense）！ 跟任何组织行为一样，“英语专业建设”没有好与坏之别，只有哪个更加makes sense或者makes more sense的说法! 按照Weick的”SIR COPE”的理论模式，如果要使得“英语专业建设”更加理性和有说服力，似乎有如下功课要做： 10/27-28/2012 华中华南地区2012年英语专业协作会暨学术研讨会（郑州大学） S = Social“英语专业建设”是一种社会共同构建，除了保留过去经验性的做法，最好还倾听业内外、院系内外、校内外、教育与非教育、家庭和社会、政府与学校、学生与校友、培养单位与用人