《刑法》第306条存废问题的研究.docxVIP

Study on Reservation or Revocation ofArticle 306 of Criminal LawA Thesis Submitted to Chongqing Universityin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for theDegree of Master of LawByLi XiangSupervised by Associate Professor Zhou GuowenMajor: LawCollege of Law ofChongqing University, Chongqing, ChinaApril, 2011重庆大学硕士学位论文摘要中文摘要近些年来，关于刑法第 306 条的存废的讨论持续不断。社会各界对此法条褒贬不一，而支持保留 306 条的观点与呼吁废除 306 条的观点也是针锋相对，各说各理，双方论据十足,难以轻易作出结论。笔者试图对双方观点进行分析评价，找出需要完善之处，提出解决方案，争取为这个疑难问题的解决作贡献。本文内容主要分为三个部分，第一部分将对国内外关于“律师伪证罪”的立法进行考察，分析不同之处，借鉴国外先进经验，以期“去其糟粕取之精华”。阐述我国刑法 306 条的立法背景与犯罪构成，对该条文进行深一层的认识和分析。第二部分先从司法现状出发，介绍刑法第 306 条在实践中的实际应用情况。详细介绍保留论和废弃论的观点，将两派的主要论据进行阐述，并作适当分析，表达笔者的观点，认为应当对该条进行完善。第三部分笔者阐明自己对于该法条的观点，先从从不同角度分析该法条的不足之处，借以说明完善刑法 306 条的必要性。而后从程序法和实体法两方面出发，提出具体完善方案，并进行总结，以期给立法者提供参考。关键词：律师伪证罪 ，辩护人，诉讼代理人I重庆大学硕士学位论文英文摘要ABSTRACTIn recent years, the discussions about the abolition of the Article 306 of CriminalLaw is ongoing. And the opinions are quite different in every aspects of the society.Furthermore, people who support the retention of Article 306 are opposed to those whocall for the abolition of Article 306. Both have sufficient evidences and reasons, makingit difficult to make a conclusion. The author attempts to analyze and evaluate bothperspectives, seeking the areas that are imperative to improve and offering a proposal,in order to contribute to the solution of this difficult problem.This document is divided into three parts. The first is to inspect on the legislationof the lawyer’s perjury at home and abroad by analyzing the differences and learningfrom the advanced foreign experience. The aim is to discard the dross and select theessence. Moreover, by means of elaborating the legislative background and crimeconstitution of the Article 306, the author gives a deeper understanding and analysis ofthe provision.The second part is to start from the current situation of the justice and describe thesituation of the application of Article 306 in practice. Through specific introductionabout the