商场促销计划.docVIP

May 11, 2004 DP - 7 REACTING FLOW ENVIRONMENTS BRANCH ELORET DECOUPLING FLOW MATERIAL RESPONSE 解耦流及材料反应 ? TPS materials not selected at the preliminary design phase – computations should guide this choice 初始设计阶段未选择防热系统材料 – 计算应引导至此选择 ? Assume that the surface is non-conducting and can only re-radiate – adiabatic back wall assumption 假设表面无传导性，只有再辐射性 – 隔热后墙假设 ? Assume that the surface promotes complete recombination of atoms reaching it – conservative assumption because maximum heat release can be expected 假设表面促使到达表面的原子完全重组 – 保守假设从而得出最大散热 ? Aerothermal analysis can now be performed with a steady flow assumption at any trajectory point – time discretization 气动热分析只能在稳定流场假设下的任意轨道点进行 – 时间离散化 ?Time discretization cannot be too fine for CFD computations – enormous number of computations required 时间离散化不太适用于CFD计算 – 需要对大量数据进行计算 ? Need to supplement CFD computations with engineering methodology of acceptable accuracy – engineering methods are much quicker 需要使用合适精准度的工程学方法补充CFD计算 – 工程学方法更为快速 May 11, 2004 DP - 8 REACTING FLOW ENVIRONMENTS BRANCH ELORET ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION 关于此次演示 ? To demonstrate the combination of CFD and engineering methodology in defining aerothermal environments for TPS design 演示为防热设计所定义的气动热环境下的CFD与工程学方法的结合 ? Assumes Earth atmospheric flight – flow medium consists of N2, O2, products 假设地球大气层飞行 – 气场至少包含氮气、氧气及其化合物 ? Does not call out material choices or sizing 不涉及材料选择及大小 ? Uses X-33 flight vehicle as a case study 使用X-33飞行器作为案例研究 ? The presentation is not a comprehensive account of various approaches 此演示非多种方法的综合预计 ? The presentation is a focused one – drawn on the experience of a small team at NASA Ames Research Center 此次演示为一次集中演示 – 由NASA阿姆斯研究中心一个小组经验绘出 May 11, 2004 DP - 9 REACTING FLOW ENVIRONMENTS BRANCH ELORET REQUIREMENTS – CONFIGURATION 要求 – 结构 ? Since in-depth conduction is neglected, only the outer surface (outer mold line or OML) definition is required 由于已忽略深度传导性问题，此处只要求对外表（外模线，又称OML）做出定义 ? Configuration is usually available in some CAD format 在一些CAD