Vector牙周治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及主观评价.docVIP

Vector牙周治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及主观评价 　　[摘要]目的：比较Vector超声治疗仪与传统超声治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及患者对疼痛的主观感受。方法：选取30例慢性牙周炎患者，在每例患者的上、下颌各选一单颌使用Vector牙周治疗仪（实验组）,另一单颌使用常规超声牙周治疗仪（对照组）作为对照。治疗前和治疗后3个月检查PD和BI。患者治疗结束后VAS记分进行疼痛评价。结果：实验组和对照组PD和BI术前和3个月后比较均有明显下降，具有统计学意义（P0.05）。实验组和对照组VAS值分别为10.80±2.75和39.23±2.46，两组比较具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论：Vector超声治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎和传统超声治疗仪有相同的疗效，但是患者疼痛明显减轻。 　　[关键词]Vector超声治疗仪；慢性牙周炎；评价 　　[中图分类号]R783[文献标识码]A [文章编号]1008-6455（2014）06-0487-03 　　 　　Clinical effects and subjective pain of VectorTM-system on chronic periodontitis 　　XIE Yong-jiang1,ZHAO Yue2,NING Jia1,YAN Lei1,YE Man-jun1 　　（1.Department of Stomatology,Daqing Oil Field General Hospital,Daqing 163001,Heilongjiang,China;2.Cardiology Department,Daqing Oil Field General Hospital） 　　 　　Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of the present study is to compare the clinical effects and subjective pain of VectorTM-system on chronic periodontitis. Methods Selected 30 cases of periodontitis patients. On each patient, select a single jaw using VectorTM-system (experimental group), another single jaw using conventional ultrasonic instrument (control group) as a control. Examining bleeding index and probing depth before the first visit treatment ,initiated therapy after three months. Evaluating VAS score after treatment. Results Both PD and BI were significantly decreased before and after treatment in two groups, there was statistical significance (P0.05）. Experimental group and control group VAS values were respectvely 10.80±2.75 and 39.23±2.46, there was statistical significance (P0.05).Conclusion Getting the same effect on treating chronic periodontitis between VectorTM-system and traditional ultrasound therapy device, but there is less pain in VectorTM-system 　　Key words:VectorTM-system;chronic periodontitis;evaluation 　　牙周炎是由菌斑微生物所引起的牙周支持组织的慢性感染性疾病，导致牙周支持组织的炎症和破坏。牙周治疗的主要目的是去除龈上和龈下牙石菌斑，阻止疾病的进展。许多研究表明，超声与传统手工刮治器比较具有很多优点，一方面，Ⅱ°和Ⅲ°根分叉病变患者超声刮治优于手工刮治器；另一方面，超声刮治器工作效率明显高于手工刮治器[1-2]。但是超声也有一些缺点和不足：超声工作尖在工作过程中产热损伤了牙髓和牙周组织；工作尖触觉的敏感引起患者术中感觉不适