- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
躯体化障碍患者神经知认功能比较
躯体化障碍患者神经认知功能比较
【摘要】 目的: 探讨躯体化障碍患者神经认知功能障碍的特点。方法: 对60例符合ICD - 10躯体化障碍诊断标准的患者给予药物治疗8周,在治疗前、后给予威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、持续操作测验(CPT),同时测验50例正常人作为对照组。患者组的测验结果进行自身前后比较、并分别与正常对照组进行组间比较。结果: 患者组治疗前、后WCST的总应答数、完成分类数、持续性错误数、非持续性错误数自身比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05~0.01)。患者组治疗前WCST的总应答数、完成分类数、持续性错误数、非持续性错误数与正常对照组组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01~0.001),治疗后与正常对照组组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者组治疗前、后CPT 得分比较,在无干扰时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),有干扰时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者组治疗前CPT 得分与正常对照组组间比较,在无干扰时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),有干扰时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后与正常对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 躯体化障碍患者存在神经认知功能障碍,但经过治疗可以改善。
【关键词】躯体化障碍;神经认知功能; 威斯康星卡片分类测验;持续操作测验
Comparison of neurocognitive function in patients with somatization disorder
〔Abstract〕 Objective: To explore the neurocognitive function in patients with somatization disorder . Methods: sixty somatization disorder patients who met the ICD-10 were treated for 8 weeks, they were measured with Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Continuous performance Test(CPT)before and after therapy. And fifty healthy peoples were measured with WCST and CPT as control group .The test results of patients group were compared before and after therapy, and they were compared with the control group respectively. Results: The significant difference in the total trials, number of completed classification, preservative errors, nor-preservative errors of WCST were observed betweem before and after therapy of patients group (P<0.05~0.01). And the same results was also found between patients group befor therapy and control group(p<0.05). And no significant difference was also found between patients group after therapy and control group(p>0.05). Compared the CPT scores between patients group of before and after therapy, the significant difference wasn’t found in no interfere stimulus( P>0.05), but they could be found in interfere stimulus (P<0.05). And the same results also be found between patients group of before therapy and control group. But no significant difference between patients group of after therapy and control
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2024版酒店operaPMS系统中培训教程 .pdf VIP
- (2025)西宁市入团考试精选题库(含答案).docx VIP
- 提高椎管内分娩镇痛率PDCA精品课件.pptx VIP
- 2020运动训练人才培养方案(中职).pdf VIP
- 沥青路面铺筑施工技术交底 .pdf VIP
- 2025新疆喀什地区“才聚喀什智惠丝路”秋季招才引智707人笔试备考试题及答案解析.docx VIP
- 电力公司电力设施保护与抢修手册.doc VIP
- DL_5070-2012-T_水轮机金属蜗壳现场制造安装及焊接工艺导则.pdf VIP
- 半导体材料(大学课件)张源涛ppt全套教学课件.pptx
- 卫生监督手段与程序小测试卷含答案.docx
原创力文档


文档评论(0)