Prsentation PowerPoint From Complex to Simple Speech Acts公关#表示PowerPoint 233从复杂到简单的言语行为.pptVIP

From Complex to Simple Speech Acts: a Bidimensional Analysis of Illocutionary Forces Claire BEYSSADE Jean-Marie MARANDIN Aim (1/4) Analyze the illocutionary impact of utterances in an explicit framework which combines - a grammar for sentences and - a?grammar for conversation i. e. Ginzburg, A semantics for Interaction in Dialogue (to app.) Aim (2/4) We assume that illocutionary import of linguistic expressions can be modeled in terms of types of update of Speaker’s Dialogue Gameboard (Ginzburg 1997). Such an assumption is not specific to our framework of reference (See i.a. dialogue acts analyzed as updates of the Conversational Score in Poesio Traum 1998). Aim (3/4) The features of linguistic expressions we are interested in are: (i) Clause types (e.g. declarative vs interrogative type) (1) a. Mary has arrived b. Has Mary arrived (ii) Prosodic structures (e.g. falling vs rising contour) (2) a. Marie est arrivée H L b. Marie est arrivée L H Aim (4/4) (iii) Tag constructions (e.g. French tags n’est-ce pas, sans indiscrétion) (3) a. Marie est arrivée n’est-ce pas ‘Marie has arrived, hasn’t she?’ b. Sans indiscrétion, Marie est arrivée ‘Without being indiscreet, has Marie arrived?’ Here, we deal with (i) and (iii). As for the illocutionary import of contours (indeed, their lack of direct illocutionary import), we refer the reader to Beyssade et al. 2004, Beyssade Marandin 2006, Marandin 2006. Claim (i) Clause types and tags are constructions (ii) Constructions are associated with update instructions (iii) Main point: there are two types of update – Update of Speaker’s own commitment – Update of Speaker’s call on Addressee Outline of the talk Part 1:?Utterances and speech acts Part 2: Ginzburg’s framework and our revisions - Extension of the notion of commitment - Explicit notion of call on Addressee Part 3: Illocutionary analysis of: - Core cl