地西他滨联合半程和全程CAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的效果比较.docVIP

地西他滨联合半程和全程CAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的效果比较.doc

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
地西他滨联合半程和全程CAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的效果比较.doc

地西他滨联合半程和全程CAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的效果比较   [摘要] 目的 分析地西他滨联合半程和全程CAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和急性髓系白血病(AML)的效果差异。 方法 回顾性分析2012年10月~2013年10月乐山市人民医院肿瘤血液科收治的MDS和AML患者的临床资料,将所有患者分为观察组和对照组,对照组患者接受地西他滨联合半程CAG方案治疗,观察组患者接受地西他滨联合全程CAG方案治疗,对比两组患者的治疗效果、毒副作用、生存相关指标等的差异。 结果 治疗后,观察组治疗后缓解率及总反应率均高于对照组(P 0.05);观察组治疗过程中肺部感染、脑出血、严重骨髓抑制、严重中性粒细胞减少以及血小板减少事件发生率均显著低于对照组(P 0.05);观察组治疗后中位疗程数显著少于对照组,中位总生存时间显著长于对照组,1年生存率、2年生存率均显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 地西他滨联合全程CAG方案治疗MDS和AML可以更为有效地提升治疗效果,延长患者生存时间,同时不增加患者的毒副作用发生率。   [关键词] 骨髓增生异常综合征;急性髓系白血病;CAG方案;地西他滨   [中图分类号] R551.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)09(b)-0152-04   [Abstract] Objective To analyze the difference of the effect of Decitabine combined uith half and full course of CAG regimen in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods The clinical data of patients with MDS and AML admitted to Department of Tumor and Hematology, the Peoples Hospital of Leshan City from October 2012 to October 2013 was analyzed retrospectively, all patients were divided into control group and observation group, the control group received Decitabine combined with half course of CAG regimen, the observation group received Decitabine combined with full course of CAG regimen. The differences of curative effect, side effects, survival related indicators of the two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the remission rate and overall response rate of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group (P 0.05); the incidence of lung infection, brain hemorrhage, severe bone marrow suppression, severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia during treatment in the observation group were all significantly lower than those of control group (P 0.05); the number of median treatment course of observation group was less than that of control group, the median overall survival time was longer than that of control group, the 1-year survival rate and 2-year survival rate were all higher than those of control

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档