intergenerationalliteracyprogramsforincarceratedparents.doc

intergenerationalliteracyprogramsforincarceratedparents.doc

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
intergenerationalliteracyprogramsforincarceratedparents

Intergenerational Literacy Programs for Incarcerated Parents and Their Families: A Review of the Literature By William R. Muth, Ph.D. Virginia Commonwealth University wrmuth@ May, 2006 Abstract Researchers from many fields have reported the benefits of family literacy programs to children, parents, families, and society. Although some studies included incarcerated parents and their children, very little research has specifically targeted this growing population. This is problematic because prisoners -- particularly parents with limited literacy ability – and their children and other family members often experience profound challenges that include learning, coping, and maintaining contact. These challenges may be ameliorated, to some degree, by family literacy programs. This paper reports on what we know about the effects of prison-based family literacy programs and argues for their careful expansion. Much remains to be understood about the complexity of these programs and how they should be designed, implemented, and evaluated, in order to build on the few existing models. When feasible, on-line sources are linked to the text. Introduction: Incarcerated Parents, Children, and Family Ties In a secondary analysis of the 1992 National Adult Literacy Assessment (NALS) involving 1147 U.S. prisoners, Haigler, Harlow, O’Connor and Campbell (1994) found that about half of the adult prisoner sample lacked a high school diploma or GED. Further, about a third of federal, state and local prisoners performed at the lowest of five levels on a series of prose and document exercises included in the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS). (An updated assessment, the National Assessment of Adult Literacy, was administered to U.S. prisoners in 2004; a report on this population’s literacy trends is scheduled to be released in the summer of 2006. Individuals performing at NALS level one cannot reliably perform tasks such as comparing and contrasting two pieces of in

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jvdodnnv002 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档