librarymanagementsystems2001-2005.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
librarymanagementsystems2001-2005

Library management systems 2001-2005 General overview This chapter follows on from one on library management systems (LMSs) written for British Librarianship 1991-2000. That chapter ended with an overview of library management systems (LMSs) of the late 1990s by Akeroyd who described some of the functionality required by future systems which included: the integration of multiple sources and systems, both of bibliographic information and the full-text of documents; the simplification of access to sources; the personalisation of systems; a change in the way that software is created and maintained. The period under review in this chapter, 2001-5, reveals a number of changes in the LMS marketplace. The annual commentary on the LMS marketplace carried out for the April 1st issue of Library Journal gives a US perspective – which in many ways can be used to indicate trends in the period on this side of the ‘pond’ too. In 2002, for instance, Breeding noted that a small number of ever-expanding companies controlled the greatest share of the LMS market. OPACs were being developed to form ‘information portals’ to provide access to more content than basic bibliographic records (e.g. displaying book jacket images, providing access to tables of contents, abstracts, and reviews). A linked development involved allowing users to search across several information sources simultaneously. This technique became known as metasearching, or federated searching, with the resulting set of ‘hits’ presented to a user being usually sorted with duplicates (if able to be identified successfully) removed. Some LMS companies developed their own software for this, for instance Ex Libris’ MetaLib product, whereas as others bought in the technology from others, such as MuseGlobal and WebFeat. A key standard used in metasearching is that of the OpenURL. Zhu provided an overview of the development of the OpenURL and its impact on library services. In 2003, Breeding and Roddy described

文档评论(0)

jvdodnnv002 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档