- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
questionsforevaluators
Questions for evaluators
It may be useful for evaluators to refer to a checklist of questions commonly
asked in evaluations. A list of potential questions is presented below (drawing
heavily from Martin, L. ‘Planning and Organising Useful Evaluations’,
UNHCR, January 1998).
Understanding the situation
– How was the initial situation assessed? What access was there to the affected
populations? What data was collected, and how was it analysed?
– What would have happened if no assistance had been given?
– Were lives in danger?
– What are the security implications of providing/not providing assistance?
Were these considered?
– Are new movements of people/other significant events possible? Have
contingency plans been made for this?
– How have beneficiary groups been identified? Using what characterisation?
Were the special needs of certain groups (children, female-headed households,
disabled, ethic minorities) considered? Are any groups (unintentionally)
favoured over others as a consequence of the way the programme was setup?
Are beneficiaries unfairly assisted in relationship to host/other
populations?
– Was the impact of the emergency and the humanitarian programme on host
populations and the local environment considered?
– What background research was carried out on the culture and history of
beneficiary groups? How were information gaps filled?
– What efforts were made to obtain reliable disaggregated population figures?
– What range of solutions were considered to the problem?
EVALUATING HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMES in complex emergencies
– Were other agencies included in analysis of the problem and the drawing up
of response plans? Were response plans ‘holistic’ or very much determined
by the mandate of individual organisations?
– What analysis has been undertaken of possible long-term solutions to the
problems? – What is the quality of this analysis?
– Were preparedness activities carried-out?
Reviewing the plan
– Have lessons been learnt from
您可能关注的文档
- quantitativeassessmentofhandwritingindividuality.doc
- quantitativeinvivosolubilityoftruncatedcircularpermutants.doc
- quantitativeproblemschapter11.doc
- quantitativeresearchdesign–chapter9.doc
- quarkmatter2001.doc
- quarter2freeresponsequestions—englishlanguageand.doc
- queenscollegegraduateschooloflibrary.doc
- quenya-english.doc
- questforglory1walkthrough+map(bottom).doc
- questionisyouroverallbodyshape(appleorpear)and.doc
- questiontype3issue-spotter.doc
- quickspecs-9to5computer-quickspecs.doc
- quidways1700unmanagedseriesethernetswitches.doc
- quips"es.doc
- quiztqm-managerial.doc
- qwestcommercialhighspeedinternetservice–v4.0v3.0.doc
- radiochemicalmeasurementsconference.doc
- radiochemistryandnuclearchemistry.doc
- radiocommunicationstudygroups.doc
- railpreservationprogram.doc
文档评论(0)