- 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
thedevelopmentofawageassessmenttoolforbusiness
The Development of a Wage Assessment Tool for Business Services
By the time this special issue of Access has circulated, the Department of Family and Community Services will most likely have contracted a consultancy to develop a wage assessment tool for Business Services.
This is not a new policy objective. One of the recommendations of the 1985 “New Directions” Report of the Handicapped Programs Review (that resulted in the Disability Services Act 1986) was the establishment of a “productivity based minimum wage for people working in long term supported employment on a pro-rata basis keyed to prevailing able bodied rates for that industry”.
It has been a long and circuitous route for this objective to re-surface as a possible reality. It’s re-appearance raises a number of interesting questions. Why now? What caused the big delay? What terms of reference have DFACS set? What are the major hurdles, the contentious issues, that have to be cleared or sorted before an acceptable wage assessment tool is rolled out and operational?
The Background
The 1985 recommendation about an all-inclusive wage assessment process was buried not to be resurrected until ten years later by the Baume Report. The influential 1990 Ronalds Report, though highlighting many shortcomings of traditional sheltered workshops, had focused on the development of a wage assessment process applicable to the mainstream labour market.
Reasons as to why the focus narrowed down to open employment can be found in subsequent policy developments: it become apparent that the official 5 year transition period for sheltered workshops to meet the principles and objectives of the DSA would not be achieved by the majority of change-resistant services; and the Department in 1990 funded the National Technical Advisory Unit to assist them to reform their business and employment practices. By 1992 the Government, bowing to ACROD’s constant lobbying, had amended the legislation to extend this transition peri
您可能关注的文档
- thebusinessofmarriagemetaphorsinjaneausten's.doc
- thecentraluniversityfornationalities.doc
- thechallengesforurbanwatermanagementintropical.doc
- thechallengesofglobalizationandtherole.doc
- thechecklistisdesignedforuseinassessmentofindividual.doc
- thechecklistprovidesagenerallistofmajorissuesthatshould.doc
- thechildprotectionsysteminazerbaijan.doc
- thechileanavocadoindustry,anoverview.doc
- thechinajournal.doc
- thechinesegovernmentscholarship.doc
- thedevelopmentofhumanresource.doc
- thedhammapadathewayofthebuddha,vol8.doc
- thedisciplinecommitteeofthecollege.doc
- thedistinctionbetweenenglishsynonyms.doc
- theearthinstitute.doc
- theeconomicbackwardnessofnations.doc
- theeconomicsofmoney,banking,andfinancialmarkets,.doc
- theeconomicsofshame.doc
- theeffectofadrlistingonunderlyingequitybehavior.doc
- theeducationaccessandsuccessprogram.doc
文档评论(0)