- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Probe into the Power Relations in “Counterparts”.doc
Probe into the Power Relations in “Counterparts”
【Abstract】This article is to explore the characters’ power relations, even Ireland and Britain’s from Cooperative Principle to deeply analyze the dialogues between the hero Farrington and his boss in “Counterparts”.The deeply analysis of the dialogues can help readers better appreciate the author’s stylistic choices.
【Key words】Counterparts; Cooperative Principle
1. Introduction
Under the colonial domination of Britain in the 20th century, the Irish lead a gloomy life. The power relations of characters can also reveal the two countries’, Ireland and Britain’s in “Counterparts”.
2. Analysis
There are three dialogues between Farrington and his boss at the office, which plays a major part in “Counterparts”.
The first dialogue takes place as follows: (1) Come in! Farrington? What is the meaning of this? ...(2)But Mr.Shelley said, sir... In this dialogue, Farringotn is summoned to his boss Mr.Alleyne’s office and is rebuked for not handing in a copy of contract in time. In (1), Mr. Alleyne’s questions violate the maxim of quantity. Mr.Alleyne makes his contribution more informative than is required, and repeatedly insults Farrington for not finishing the contract. Mr. Alleyne does not show his purpose until the end of the dialogue. The same is true to (3) and (5). Especially in (3), Mr. Alleyne interrupts Farrington before he gives a complete answer, which is a blunt act of non-cooperation and also flouts the quantity. The boss can interrupt and disregard the employee, which shows the power relation between them. Faced with the pressing intense questions, Farrington’s answer in (2) obviously flouts the quality. He does not directly answer Mr.Alleyne’s question, he just wants to imply why he cannot finish the copy of contract in time and it is not his fault in order to avoid the clash with his boss. Under a series of Mr. Alleyne’s threatening questions, Farrington gives repetitive direct answers “Ye
您可能关注的文档
- Linux的http网络服务器.doc
- Lis系统在社区居民档案中的应用.doc
- LOFT风格在旧建筑改造中的运用.doc
- LTE网络中的微基站研究.doc
- LTE网络中语音业务解决方案探讨.doc
- Magnatrol导波雷达液位计运行中存在的问题及解决方案.doc
- Medusa’s Past Tragedy and New opinion.doc
- MEMS陀螺仪在运动相机中的应用.doc
- MongoDB:开源2.0时代的数据库.doc
- MOOC中国寻找新机会.doc
- Probe on Compiling of English Linguistics Textbooks for Independent Colleges.doc
- Protecting Trees Means Protecing Ourselves.doc
- Provoking Trade Disputes Hinders Global Economic Recovery.doc
- PTA干燥机轮带润滑方式的探讨.doc
- PTN技术在智能电网中的应用分析.doc
- PTN组网结构探讨.doc
- PTN网络业务承载方式探讨.doc
- PVC细密封线自动喷涂后的节拍平衡.doc
- Q&A《南都周刊》问倪匡.doc
- QFII资金动向.doc
文档评论(0)