EPRIStudiesofIGCCImpacts–Emissions,Economicsand.pptVIP

EPRI Studies of IGCC Impacts – Emissions, Economics and Status APPA New Generation Workshop August 1, 2007 Portland, Oregon Stu Dalton (sdalton@)Director, Generation U.S. Capacity Additions – All TypesEvaluation of Announcements, 1999 to 2015, as of Fourth Qtr. 2006 New Technology Deployment Curve for Coal Coal Technology Options – w/o CO2 Capture (approximate data) Capital Cost Estimates in Press Announcements and Submissions to PUCs 2006-7 — All Costs Are Way Up! EPRI PC and IGCC Net Power Output With and Without CO2 Capture (Illinois #6 Coal) EPRI PC and IGCC Capital Cost EstimatesWith and Without CO2 Capture (Illinois #6 Coal)(All IGCC and CCS cases have +10% Contingency for FOAK) EPRI PC and IGCC Cost of ElectricityWith and Without CO2 Capture (Illinois #6 Coal)(All IGCC and CCS cases have +10% TPC Contingency for FOAK) Basis for EPRI CoalFleet Program 2006 PC IGCC Estimates Report 1013355 - Nth and FOAK (First of a Kind) Total Plant Costs (TPC) include total field costs, engineering, and contingency. Historically, usually estimated for Nth-of-a-kind plants. FOAK costs have not typically been included in previously reported estimates. However, in view of the current SOA and rapidly escalating costs, an additional 10% contingency has been added to the IGCC and CO2 capture designs. TCR is also reported because it is believed to be closer to what is reported to PUCs in project submissions For PC plants, EPRI has used a TCR/TPC multiplier of 1.16, and estimates are shown as range -5% to +10% For IGCC plants, EPRI has used a TCR/TPC multiplier of 1.19, and estimates are shown as range -5% to +20% Most previous studies reported cost of capture at the battery limit. In this report, we have added $10/mt for transportation, monitoring, and storage. So reported costs include CCS. We recognize that the use of these additional contingencies, multipliers, and ranges for IGCC and CO2 capture is debatable. It is anticipated that they should be reduced as the tech