3-Sweep_userstudy.pdfVIP

User Studies for 3-Sweep? 1 User Study This supplemental file provides detailed statistics of the user study and screenshots of users’ modeling results. In this user study, ten subjects were selected. Eight of them are undergraduate students majoring in computer science and electrical engineering while the other two are artists who are experienced in 3D modeling. Seven among the eight students are novices to 3D object modeling while the other one (S8) is interested in geometry processing and has modeling experience. Between the artists, one is professional in 3DMax and the other is professional in Blender. We provided 13 images for them and split the images into three sets. Set I consists of four images in which the objects are very simple shapes and can be represented by single primitives. Set II contains seven photos which are more complex. Objects in these photos have several parts but the constraints are rather simple. Set III has two photos, and several constraints should be added in the modeling process. We let the eight students and the two artists model the shapes in all the three sets. We asked the artists to load the images into the commercial softwares and try to model the objects as close as possible. Each of the students was given a five-minute instruction of our system. During their modeling process, we recorded the time they used and saved their modeling results. We list the modeling time and modeling results below. Each model was presented to five evaluators (not selected as subjects) and their average scores are used. The evaluators do not know which model comes from which subject. We measured the quality of each model by a subjective score ranging from 1 to 5. Scores: 5 = very good, precise; 4 = good, but with slightly noticeable artifacts; 3 = obvious artifacts, but still acceptable; 2 = very obvious artifacts, not quite acceptable; 1 = very bad, unacceptable. We list modeling results and statistics below. For all the modeling results in the figur