网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

26 746-749 接692 食品安全与检测 4-20 广州市售鲜鸡肉微生物污染状况调查.pdf

26 746-749 接692 食品安全与检测 4-20 广州市售鲜鸡肉微生物污染状况调查.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
26 746-749 接692 食品安全与检测 4-20 广州市售鲜鸡肉微生物污染状况调查

现代食品科技 Modern Food Science and Technology 2010, Vol.26, No.7 广州市售鲜鸡肉微生物污染状况调查 何瑞琪1,魏素红2,郭善广1,符小燕1,蒋爱民1,李津洪1 (1.华南农业大学食品学院,广东广州 510642)(2.兰州市动物疫病预防控制中心,甘肃兰州 730050) 摘要:为了了解广州市市售生鲜鸡肉的微生物污染状况,并为建立食物污染及中毒的预警系统提供数据基础。2009年10月 到12月从广州市天河区5个农贸市场和5个超市采集鲜鸡肉50件,对其表面进行了菌落总数、嗜冷菌数、大肠菌群、沙门氏菌、 李斯特菌、金黄色葡萄球菌的定性、定量检测。结果表明,农贸市场鸡肉产品的菌落总数和大肠菌群数比超市的高;而超市鸡 肉产品的嗜冷菌数要比农贸市场的高。农贸市场沙门氏菌检出率为44.0%、单增李斯特菌检出率为36.0%、金黄色葡萄球菌检 出率为36.0%。超市沙门氏菌检出率为28.0%、单增李斯特菌检出率为28.0%、金黄色葡萄球菌检出率为36.0%。总体上超市的 鲜鸡肉微生物污染程度比农贸市场的低。 关键词:鸡肉;微生物;污染 文章篇号:1673-9078(2010)7-746-749 Survey of Microbiological Contamination of Raw chicken of Guangzhou HE Rui-qi1, Wei Su-hong2, GUO Shan-guang1, FU Xiao-yan1, JIANG Ai-min1, LI Jin-hong1 (1.College of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China) (2.Lanzhou Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center, Lanzhou 730050, China) Abstract: The level of microbial contamination of commercial raw chicken in Guangzhou market was determined in this survey from October to December, 2009. Fifty samples were collected from ten markets of Tianhe District, Guangzhou, and tested for a range of foodborne pathogens and indicator organisms, including the numbers of total colonies, Psychrophilic bacteria, Coliform bacteria, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus present on the surface of the raw chicken. The results showed that the numbers of total colonies and Coliform bacteria in the raw chicken samples from farm markets were higher than those from supermarkets, while the number of Psychrophilic bacteria in the former was lower than in the later. The detection rates of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus in samples from farm markets were 44.0 %, 36.0%, and 36.0%, respectively, while these in samples from supermarket were 28.0%, 28.0%, and 36.0%, respectively. In general, the level of microbial contamination of raw chicken samples from supermarkets was lower than that from farm markets. Key words: chicken; microbiolog

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档