BETWEEN EVENTS AND WORLDS UNDER HISTORICAL NECESSITY.pdf

BETWEEN EVENTS AND WORLDS UNDER HISTORICAL NECESSITY.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
BETWEEN EVENTS AND WORLDS UNDER HISTORICAL NECESSITY

BETWEEN EVENTS AND WORLDS UNDER HISTORICAL NECESSITY Tim Fernando Computer Science Department Trinity College Dublin Tim.Fernando@tcd.ie Abstract. Events and worlds under historical necessity are re-analyzed as schedules of eventuality-types. The perfect and non-root modals in Condoravdi 2002 are refor- mulated, reproducing over schedules the backward time shift in the perfect and the forward time expansion in modals. 1. Introduction Just as (semantic) accounts of modality commonly invoke possible worlds, theories of temporality (eg aspect) often appeal to event[ualitie]s. But what are events? And what are worlds? We can investigate these questions together in works that combine events with worlds, such as Condoravdi 2002, henceforth C2. The perfect and non-root (= epistemic or metaphysical) modals are analyzed in C2 subject to historical necessity (Thomason 1984). That analysis is recounted briefly in §2. A notion of schedule that subsumes events and worlds is presented in §3, on the basis of which the perfect and the modals are reformulated in §4. To more easily digest the formal details that follow, one of the many linguistic exam- ples in C2 should help. (1) He might have won. We can read (1) epistemically as in (2) or metaphysically as in (3). (2) He might have, for all I know, won. (3) He might have, at that stage, won, but he didn’t. The words ‘might’ and ‘have’ are analyzed in C2 by functions MIGHT and PERF, in terms of which (1)’s epistemic reading arises from, roughly put, MIGHT(PERF(he-win)) and (1)’s counterfactual reading from the reversed scoping PERF(MIGHT(he-win)) . We spell this out more precisely next. 2. Temporal properties in C2 The semantic set-up in C2 assumes that the following are given: (i) a set Pt of temporal points/instants linearly ordered by ?, relative to which the set Ti of times can be conceived as consisting of non-empty subsets t of Pt (including singletons) such that for every z ∈ Pt, z ∈ t whenever x ? z ? y for some x, y ∈ t (th

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档