Does Schumpeterian Creative Destruction Lead to Higher Productivity Evidence on Entry and E.pdf

Does Schumpeterian Creative Destruction Lead to Higher Productivity Evidence on Entry and E.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共37页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Does Schumpeterian Creative Destruction Lead to Higher Productivity Evidence on Entry and E

2003 International Comparative Analysis of Enterprise (micro) Data Conference (CAED) Cass Business School, City of London 15-16 September 2003 Does Schumpeterian Creative Destruction Lead to Higher Productivity? Evidence on Entry and Exit in Portuguese Manufacturing Carlos Carreira and Paulino Teixeira Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra Av. Dias da Silva, 165 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal Corresponding author: Carlos Carreira Tel: +351-239790545; Fax: + 351-239-790514; e-mail: ccarreir@fe.uc.pt. May 2003 This study examines the firm dynamics (namely the entry and exit of firms) and their contribution to industry productivity growth. We used an original and statistically representative unbalanced panel of Portuguese manufacturing firms (1991-2000). As expected, the entry and exit rates were very substantial. The entry market shares of newly created firms were very small but new firms did tend to show strong market share growth rates. Entrants were less productive than incumbents, but the differences in productivity tended to vanish very quickly. Exitors were shown to be less productive than entrants. Our decomposition of the sources of productivity growth showed that a large percentage of industry-level productivity growth could be imputed to firm dynamics. Keywords: Entry and Exit; Creative Destruction, Productivity Growth; Industrial Dynamics. JEL - code(s): D21, D24, L60, O40, O47. 1 1 Introduction Productivity growth patterns have been widely discussed in the literature at both aggregate (macroeconomic)- and industry-level. But growth takes place in individual firms/establishments. Understanding resource reallocation at the micro level, and its relationship with industry productivity growth, are thus crucial in designing new industrial policies. Our main concern is the study of firm dynamics (namely the entry and exit of firms) and their contribution to industry productivity growth. We will

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档