GMAT写作快速分析逻辑错误之横向错误类比-智课教育.pdf

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资料 GMAT写作快速分析逻辑错误之横向错误类比-智课教 育 本节课的主要内容是GMAT写作常见逻辑错误中的横向错误类比， 教会考生如何高效备考GMAT写作并获得理想的成绩，GMAT写作快速 分析逻辑错误之横向错误类比，快和小编一起去学习一下吧。 The following is part of a business plan being discussed at a board meeting of the Perks Company: It is no longer cost-effective for the Perks Company to continue offering its employees a generous package of benefits and incentives year after year. In periods when national unemployment rates are low, Perks may need to offer such a package in order to attract and keep good employees, but since national unemployment rates are now high, Perks does not need to offer the same benefits and incentives. The money thus saved could be better used to replace the existing plant machinery with more technologically sophisticated equipment, or even to build an additional plant. Discuss how well reasoned ... etc. 错误分析： 1. 以整体推个体：national unemployment rates are low may need to offer such a package in order to attract and keep good employees; national unemployment rates are high does not need to offer the same benefits and incentives 2. 无理假设：the cost-effectiveness of a wage policy is determined solely by whatever wages a market can currently bear; The money saved could be better used to replace the existing plant machinery with more technologically sophisticated equipment, or even to build additional plant. 首段： 1. 结论重现(the conclusion):funds currently spent on the employee benefits package should be redirected to either upgrade plant machinery or build an additional plant 2. 推理过程重现(the line of reasoning):It is no longer cost-effective. National unemployment rates are low may need to offer such a package… National unemployment rates are now high does not need to offer the same benefits and incentives. The money saved could be better used to replace the existing plant machinery with more technologically sophisticated equipment, or even to build an additional plant. 3. 一句话评价：unconvincing/ weak/ defective/ problematic/ questionable/ unsound. 中间第一