Chinese wine fight fight up - the sixth Chinese wine divergent views on selection.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 26 Chinese wine ‘fight fight’ up - the sixth ‘Chinese wine’ divergent views on selection April 12, the Ministry of Commerce of concern sixth ‘Chinese wine’ assessment activities officially announced the list of primaries, as a lit fuse ... ... The primaries, a total of 67 liquor brands the list, of which 36 liquor brands, 11 brands of red wine, beer 20, which were relatively well-known businesses. One liquor wine list will include the directors, Baofeng, Yellow Crane Tower and many other old wine out, Shuijingfang, JLF, and other new wines Ruyuan elected to obtain the corresponding higher status. However, when the industry who see Mao sword with the five columns of black land, Cotton Tree Drive, when wine, could not help but ask: ‘These brands can also be called on the Chinese wine do? ‘Evaluation of the Ministry of Commerce of the unexpected results appear at once himself pushed to the cusp of the. Wine selection, businesses dissatisfied with? The focus of the dispute focused on the white wine category selection results. Primary list after the publication of six well-known liquor companies in the quickest time, submitted a joint seal ‘on the Commerce Department’ of the Sixth China wine list primaries ‘objection’ to the text materials, six-funded enterprises, for The activities are in compliance, evaluation based on charges in connection to the enterprise questioned the seven areas that the Ministry of Commerce held the wine selection inconsistent with the national relevant laws and regulations for China’s approach to wine evaluation specifically how the provisions of it? ‘Chinese wine classification board’ is how generated composed of by whom? Enterprises have little knowledge of these messages and so on, finally even suggested that the Ministry of Commerce should maintain the perspective of development of the industry, cancel the assessment. The Commerce Department is responsible for the assessment of the relevant responsible person