CPU inside the war of words.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 9 CPU inside the war of words Can be said that there is no industry to industry, like the CPU, like drama so ups and downs. From June 28, 2005 AMD announced that it has the United States filed suit in Delaware federal district court alleging that Intel used illegal means to prevent computer makers to buy AMD processor-date, in less than six months time, another spate of real pseudo-dual-core battle, X86 processor core technology transfer to China and other events, each event is accompanied by each other with a look of contempt and disdain of the war of words. Their strong, confrontational and unpredictable nature of the results of the slightest inferior to the World Cup finals, and thus triggered the public on this abstruse difficult to understand high-tech industry attention. Exciting drama when there can Comment on the Department. However, in prior commentaries, it is necessary to do a brief background to the competition, a description: April 22, 2003, AMD announced the launch of the world’s first 32-bit computing platform is compatible with x86 64-bit processor-Opteron. While Intel had previously owned a 64-bit processor technology, but its IA 64-bit architecture is not compatible with existing 32-bit computing platform. Some analysts have pointed out that this is because Intel in the personal computer 32-bit processors, dominant on the market situation, there should be a means of deliberately slowing down technological upgrading as much as possible in 32-bit computing platforms to maximize profits. In other words, Intel should be possible to extend the 32-bit computing platform, the ‘cash cow’ status, exhausted every means to carry out the interests of ‘harvesting’. However, AMD-compatible 64-bit processors is no doubt the 32-bit computing platform and 64-bit computing platform erected in the transition between the bridge, its role is both to the technological upgrading of the user space, but also to protect users in 32-bit computin