Placing emphasis on research designed to improve the quality of clinical research details.docVIP

Placing emphasis on research designed to improve the quality of clinical research details.doc

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Placing emphasis on research designed to improve the quality of clinical research details

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 10 Placing emphasis on research designed to improve the quality of clinical research details With a good clinical research projects, if there is no scientific research design, even with the state’s key funding issues, it is hard to achieve the desired purpose, worse, may result in human, material and financial resources, in particular, a waste of precious time . According to a sample survey, in 1985 and 1995, two years, five kinds of Chinese Medical Association published in the journal 112 on the theory of the diagnostic test results showed that 90.0% more than reasonable research design papers. 16.0% of them the lack of ‘gold standard’ (goldstandard) assessment; 35.7% positive rate of literature reports only, without sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic and other basic indicators, but also not covered by the likelihood ratio and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and evaluation and so on. In the clinical study, the sample surveys from 1985 to 1996, 35 kinds of Chinese Medical Association published in the journal series of randomized controlled trials (RCT) study on a total of 164, which set out the method of randomization were only 15.2%; account of the random grouping method, but errors are 5.5%; as much as 79.3% on the study itself is a reference to randomized controlled trials, but the text simply no way on the randomization methods and narrative. As reported by stratified random controlled trials, then the contradictions more. In addition, the recent national clinical research projects focus on the incomplete evaluation and analysis, at present, research design flaws rate of about 30%. The existence of these problems very seriously impeded the improvement of China’s clinical research level, the clinical progress also has an important negative impact. Chinese Medical Association Society of Clinical Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology Collaboration in China and the China Committee of Medical Journal Editor

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

hhuiws1482 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5024214302000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档