Authors' Reply Don't Let the Hypothesis Slip 英文参考文献.docVIP

Authors' Reply Don't Let the Hypothesis Slip 英文参考文献.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Authors' Reply Don't Let the Hypothesis Slip 英文参考文献

Open access, freely available online Correspondence Unjusti?ed Restrictions on Letters to the Editor Box 1.“Editors Should Promote Self-Correction in Science and Participate in Efforts to Improve the Practice of Scienti?c Investigation by: Douglas G. Altman Editors of medical journals accept that published research should be open to comment and correction in published correspondence ([1]; Box 1). “Post-publication peer review” enables comments on, clari?cations of, and corrections to published research. All journals should have a correspondence page for this purpose. I previously criticised the effective “statute of limitations” in several leading general medical journals “whereby authors of papers are immune to disclosure of methodological weaknesses once some arbitrary (short) period has elapsed” [2]. Such a time limit discourages post-publication peer review, with potential correspondents deterred by the short and unambiguous deadline. I suggested that journals with such a policy should reconsider. The word limit on that article precluded additional adverse comments on journals’ word limits for letters, although they were presented in Table 2 of that article [2]. ? “Publishing corrections, retractions, and letters critical of articles published in their own journal. ? “Playing an active role in investigating and preventing fraud. ? “Taking responsibility for improving the level of scienti?c investigation and medical writing in the larger community of potential authors. ? “Giving authors an opportunity to review and approve edited manuscripts before they are published. ? “Participating in efforts to detect and prevent publication bias—for example, by collaborating with registries of controlled trials and publishing protocols.” Source: [1]. 2. 3. 4. Altman DG (2002) Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? JAMA 287: 2765–2767. Mullan Z (2003) Lancet correspondence: Old letters, new rules. Lancet 361: 12. Curfman GD, Graham A, Lindenfelser L, Ander

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1234554321 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档